Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
For one might hold that the thinker has the same evidence in both cases, but that that evidence is not limited to his experiences but also includes (e.g).g
A different tack is pursued by Williamson, who argues at length that we should not accept the idea that one has the same evidence in the good case and the bad case.
In this way, the requirement that the thinker has the same evidence in the good case and the bad case seems to encourage what Williamson calls 'the Phenomenal Conception of Evidence'.[10] Consider also how the aforementioned Principle of Charity encourages such a picture of evidence when it is applied to the world run by the Demon.
For if rationality is a matter of responding correctly to one's evidence, then the judgement that the thinker is equally rational in the good case and the bad case would seem to require that the thinker has the same evidence for his beliefs in both cases.
Similar(56)
"Creationists and evolutionists all have the same evidence," he said.
By Kay Boyle The New Yorker, May 17 , 1941P. 18 Retreating French soldiers returning home all had the same evidence to give: the Germans were dressed for tennis, while the French crawled out from under lorries where they'd slept maybe every night for a week, going to meet them like crippled encumbered miners.
Miss Del Monte, a beautiful girl kept hanging around the American Airlines office, with hundreds of other Refugees she was trying to get passage to… Retreating French soldiers returning home all had the same evidence to give: the Germans were dressed for tennis, while the French crawled out from under….
Retreating French soldiers returning home all had the same evidence to give: the Germans were dressed for tennis, while the French crawled out from under lorries where they'd slept maybe every night for a week, going to meet them like crippled encumbered miners.
And evidentialism holds that necessarily, people who have the same evidence are justified in believing the same things.
What we see therefore, is that although S1 and S2 proponents have the same evidence available, they make different evaluations concerning relevance and appropriateness.
Evidentialism implies that, since Tim and Tim* are mentally alike, they have the same evidence, and thus are justificationally alike as well.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com