Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Through formal error estimates, it is verified that the present version of the LTL method has the same error orders as its older counterpart.
Clearly, the phase-shifted version of the code has the same error correcting capability, rate, decoding complexity as the original code.
So using y=3<4.2 iterations will lead to less arithmetic complexity, meanwhile it has the same error correction capacity as illustrated in Figure 2 for (1).
Similar(57)
The training and testing parts also had the same error, as depicted in Fig. 2.
However, this method had the same error magnitude as the global minimization.
Otherwise, there is a possibility to have the same error results for different images as depicted above.
Hence, it might be possible to perform less y iterations (yhaving the same error correction capability than TBICM-SSD.
Also, if φ is a (c -comparison func -comparisonTheorem 2.3 we have the same error estimates (1.4)-(1.6) as in [6]-Theorem 1.8.
Differences between the calculation results and testing results, which including product's density, compression strength, surface evaluation, and deformation in three dimensions, are less than 10%, and have the same error direction.
end{aligned} (24 Thus both estimates have the same error covariance matrix, begin{aligned} Sigma _{epsilon epsilon }=Eleft( S-hat{S}right) left( S-hat{S} right) ^{prime }=Eleft( N-hat{N}right) left( N-hat{N}right) ^{prime }, end{aligned} (25)(assuming no specification or estimation error in the model for (Z_{t})).
We have assumed that all sequences in a data set have the same error rate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com