Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

has still no

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has still no" is not standard in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used in contexts where you want to emphasize the ongoing lack of something, but it is more common to use "still has no." Example: "Despite the efforts made, the project has still no funding."

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

After aging, fibrous illite has still no affinity for oil, kaolinite has an affinity for oil, but platy illite behaves more like kaolinite.

However, MWF calculation has still no gold standards and requires long acquisition and post-processing times (Deoni et al. 2013).

Two antigens, implicated in two different invasion routes (MSP9 and EBA-175) were independently classified as important for the development of the asymptomatic status, while the third protein, MSP5, has still no assigned function and is also non-essential [ 69].

Finally, our simulations show that an increase in k g, i.e. the activity of the growth module, could also contribute to the simultaneous increase in cell volume and growth rate during evolution, but such an effect has still no experimental support.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

I've still no idea why it was there.

It doesn't even matter that, several plays later, I've still no idea what Andrew Wyatt is actually singing about.

Why does Japan have still no cases of SARS, despite its geographic proximity to the most affected areas?

And yet there has still been no inquiry.

News & Media

The Guardian

He has still received no medical treatment.

News & Media

BBC

I've still got no dress.

By late 1952, Pauling had still made no new announcement.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "has still no" is understandable, consider using "still has no" for better clarity and natural flow in your writing. This slight adjustment can improve readability without altering the meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "has still no" in formal writing. Although its meaning is clear, the structure is considered non-standard. Opt for clearer alternatives like "still has no" or "remains without".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has still no" primarily functions as a descriptor, indicating the absence or lack of something at a particular point in time. As Ludwig indicates, the phrase can sound awkward.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "has still no" is understandable, it is not considered standard English and may sound awkward. Ludwig suggests opting for "still has no" for clearer and more natural-sounding writing. The phrase is used across various contexts, including science, news, and formal settings, but is not particularly frequent. Ludwig AI highlights its grammatical acceptability while recommending more common alternatives. To enhance clarity and professionalism, consider alternatives like "still lacks" or "remains without".

FAQs

What is a more common alternative to "has still no"?

The phrase "still has no" is a more common and natural-sounding alternative to "has still no". It maintains the meaning while improving readability.

Is "has still no" grammatically incorrect?

While understandable, "has still no" deviates from standard English grammar. Using "still has no" is generally preferred for grammatical correctness.

When is it acceptable to use "has still no"?

While not ideal, "has still no" might be acceptable in informal contexts where clarity is maintained. However, it's best to opt for "still has no" in formal writing.

What's the difference between "has still no" and "still has no"?

The primary difference lies in the word order. "Still has no" follows a more standard grammatical structure, placing "still" before "has", resulting in a clearer and more common phrasing compared to "has still no".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: