has risks for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has risks for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential dangers or negative consequences associated with a particular action, decision, or situation. Example: "Investing in volatile markets has risks for inexperienced investors who may not fully understand the market dynamics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Challenging Mr. Romney's residency has risks for both sides.

The New York Times

That has meant getting the North out of its epic sulk.This week's deal has risks for America.

The Economist

Colonoscopy is expensive, has risks for serious complications and requires so much time, equipment and expertise that its wide use for screening is impractical, if not impossible.

The New York Times - Health

To entice bidders, RBS is reviving the Williams & Glyn's brand, which disappeared from British high streets in 1986.But the return to an old brand – created by RBS in 1969 to unite its English and Welsh banks – has risks for any investor.

The Guardian - Business

"As key predators, their depletion also has risks for the health of entire ocean ecosystems".

Huffington Post

There is increasing evidence that breast feeding improves maternal and infant health outcomes and that infant formula milk has risks for health.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

Now they request rights, though that might have risks for them".

Huffington Post

Part of using psychedelics skillfully would be screening out people who have risks for significant mental health diagnoses like schizophrenia.

Vice

"We can only say you don't have risks for this or that.

Los Angeles Times

At the time people said they couldn't believe how stupid he'd been, how much he had risked for a photo.

The Guardian - Music

For the BS only, seven (2.9 %) did not have risk for development of PU, all of TBI Mild.

Critical Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has risks for", ensure the context clearly identifies what or who is at risk. Be specific about the potential negative consequences to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "has risks for" without specifying the nature of the risks. Instead of saying "This plan has risks for the company", clarify with, "This plan has financial and reputational risks for the company".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has risks for" functions as a verb phrase indicating that something presents potential dangers or negative consequences. Ludwig examples show it used to describe potential impacts on various entities, from businesses to ecosystems.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

42%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has risks for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something presents potential dangers or negative consequences. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is suitable for use in various contexts, particularly in news and scientific domains. When using this phrase, it's essential to specify the nature of the risks and what is at stake to ensure clarity and avoid overgeneralization. Alternative phrases like "poses a threat to" or "entails dangers for" can be used for variety, depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

entails dangers for

Replaces "has risks" with "entails dangers", focusing on the inherent dangers involved.

poses a threat to

Shifts the focus to the idea of presenting a threat rather than having risks.

carries potential hazards for

Emphasizes the presence of potential hazards instead of general risks.

presents potential peril to

Highlights the potential for serious and immediate danger.

involves possible downsides for

Focuses on the negative aspects or disadvantages that might occur.

creates vulnerabilities for

Indicates the creation of weaknesses or susceptibility to harm.

is fraught with danger for

Implies being filled with or likely to result in danger.

harbors latent risks for

Suggests hidden or concealed risks that are present but not immediately obvious.

holds unforeseen perils for

Highlights the unpredictable and potentially severe dangers.

contains elements of hazard for

Points out the presence of specific elements that could lead to hazardous situations.

FAQs

How can I use "has risks for" in a sentence?

Use "has risks for" to indicate that a particular action, situation, or entity poses potential dangers or negative consequences for someone or something. For example, "Investing in new technologies has risks for small businesses".

What are some alternatives to "has risks for"?

You can use alternatives like "poses a threat to", "entails dangers for", or "carries potential hazards for" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "has risks for" or "poses risks to"?

Both "has risks for" and "poses risks to" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on stylistic preference and the specific emphasis you want to create. "Poses risks to" might sound slightly more formal.

When should I use "has risks for" instead of "is risky for"?

"Has risks for" emphasizes the presence of potential dangers, while "is risky for" directly describes something as inherently dangerous. Use "has risks for" when you want to highlight the specific risks associated with something rather than simply labeling it as risky.