has resumed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has resumed with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "has resumed" or "has resumed with something specific." Example: "The project has resumed with new funding and support from the community."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

There are even reports that the war for talent has resumed, with the return of multiyear, multimillion dollar contracts.

The New York Times

The evacuation of east Aleppo has resumed, with about 350 people able to leave a rebel-held pocket of the city on Sunday, according to medical officials.

The Guardian

But in Alaska the age-old war on wolves has resumed with all its age-old savagery -- the savagery of humans, that is.

The New York Times

1.03pm: The inquiry has broken for lunch and will return at 2pm 2.06pm: The inquiry has resumed with the Sunday Express's James Murray contunuing his evidence.

The Guardian

And after a lull last week in coalition air strikes, largely due to low cloud, the pounding of loyalist targets has resumed with clearer weather.Better trained and with their communications still intact, government forces have not given up.

The Economist

The United States, which stopped allocating new aid in the early 1980's, has resumed with a modest $10 million, one-quarter of it going this year to preserving Tanzania's wildlife.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

The turab had resumed with full force, and it was raining.

The New Yorker

Within days, word had reached Ms. Brooks that the government investigation had resumed with a passion.

The New York Times

Now, the shops have opened again and sales of fake sunglasses have resumed with renewed vigor.

The New York Times

And in the week ending May 1, the institute's preliminary numbers show, the outflow from stock funds had resumed, with a net withdrawal of $4.4 billion.

The New York Times

After two days of washouts, tennis matches have resumed, with Roger Federer facing Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in the Quarterfinals of the U.S. Open at Arthur Ashe Stadium tonight.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to convey that something is starting again, use "has resumed" followed by a direct object, or consider alternatives like "has restarted with" or "has continued with" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "with" directly after "has resumed" unless specifying what the activity has resumed with. For example, prefer "The meeting has resumed" or "The meeting has resumed with a new agenda" over "The meeting has resumed with."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has resumed with" functions as a present perfect verb phrase aiming to denote that an action has started again, incorporating an element or condition under which the resumption occurs. However, Ludwig AI analysis indicates this phrasing is often grammatically incorrect and awkward.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "has resumed with" appears in various sources, it is often considered grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this, suggesting that the phrase is not correct in standard written English and should be approached with caution. Consider opting for alternatives like "has resumed" followed by a direct object or "has restarted with" to enhance clarity and grammatical accuracy. Predominantly used in News & Media contexts, the phrase serves to indicate the restart of an action, often with added conditions, but its overall effectiveness is compromised by its awkward construction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has restarted with

Emphasizes a complete stop followed by a fresh beginning, suitable when the interruption was significant.

has continued with

Suggests an ongoing process with a possible interruption, highlighting consistency despite the pause.

has proceeded with

Implies a planned course of action that was temporarily halted but now moves forward.

has recommenced with

A more formal way to say 'has started again', often used in official or legal contexts.

has taken up again with

Focuses on the act of resuming an activity or task that was previously set aside.

has picked up again with

Suggests a return to a previous state or activity after a break, often with renewed vigor.

has carried on with

Highlights the continuation of an activity, emphasizing resilience and perseverance.

has begun again with

Simply indicates the start of something for a second time, focusing on the repetition.

has renewed with

Focuses on the revitalization or refreshing of something that existed before.

has rebooted with

Implies a fresh start, often used metaphorically for systems or processes.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "has resumed" in a sentence?

The phrase "has resumed" should typically be followed by a noun or noun phrase indicating what action or activity has restarted. For example: "The meeting has resumed." If you want to specify how it has restarted, consider using "has restarted with".

What can I say instead of "has resumed with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "has restarted with", "has continued with", or "has proceeded with".

Is "has resumed with" grammatically correct?

While "has resumed with" appears in some sources, it's often considered grammatically awkward or incorrect. It's better to use "has resumed" or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

How does the meaning change if I use "has resumed" instead of "has resumed with"?

Using just "has resumed" implies that something is starting again, while adding "with" suggests that it's starting again and specifying an additional detail or factor, although the construction is often grammatically questionable. To communicate clearly and accurately, consider using alternatives like "has restarted with" to clarify the specific factor.