has recognised to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has recognised to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not a usable construction, as "recognised" typically does not pair with "to" in this context. Example: "The committee has recognised the need for change."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

She says that science has recognised that hunger leads to irritability.

BBC

Gordon Brown has recognised that Hain "has much to offer in the future".

The Guardian - Opinion

The mayor, Ken Livingstone, has recognised an opportunity to force central government to spend lots of money on London's transport.

The Economist

ReprintsMs Rousseff has recognised the need to improve competitiveness.

The Economist

The UN has recognised the right to safe, affordable and accessible water since 2010.

The Guardian

That is a course the advocate general has recognised is open to parliament.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The government has recognised the need to change this policy and we support this move wholeheartedly.

The Guardian

"We are pleased the government has recognised something needs to be done.

The Guardian - Money

"The DWP has recognised the need to do more and has been developing a new strategy.

BBC

The government has recognised it may have to step in to fund development and a new initiative is being formulated.

BBC

"Volvo has recognised the huge gains to be made by leading the way in electric.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "has recognised to". Use "has recognised" or a suitable alternative like "has acknowledged" or "has identified" for correct grammar and clarity.

Common error

A common mistake is adding "to" after "has recognised". This construction is grammatically incorrect. Ensure the sentence flows logically without the unnecessary "to". For example, instead of "The study has recognised to the problem", write "The study has recognised the problem".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has recognised to" is grammatically incorrect and does not serve a standard function in English. Ludwig AI confirms that this is not a usable construction.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has recognised to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies it as an unusable construction. It is advisable to use alternative phrases such as "has recognised", "has acknowledged", or "has identified" to ensure correct grammar and clear communication. This phrase is unsuitable for any context (formal, informal, scientific, etc.) due to its grammatical error. Always prioritize grammatically sound alternatives to maintain credibility and clarity in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has recognized

Omits the 'to', resulting in a grammatically sound construction for expressing acknowledgment or acceptance.

has acknowledged

Replaces 'recognized' with 'acknowledged', offering a synonym that correctly conveys acknowledgement without the 'to'.

has identified

Substitutes 'recognized' with 'identified', indicating the discovery or pinpointing of something.

has understood

Employs 'understood' in place of 'recognized', signifying comprehension or grasp of a concept.

has realized

Utilizes 'realized' as a replacement for 'recognized', denoting the gaining of awareness or insight.

has become aware of

Expands the phrase to 'has become aware of', expressing the gaining of consciousness or knowledge about something.

has taken note of

Replaces 'recognized' with 'taken note of', suggesting the act of paying attention to or observing something.

has appreciated

Substitutes 'recognized' with 'appreciated', indicating the recognition of value or merit in something.

has discerned

Employs 'discerned' in place of 'recognized', signifying the act of perceiving or distinguishing something.

has determined

Utilizes 'determined' as a replacement for 'recognized', denoting the act of firmly establishing something.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the word "recognised" in a sentence?

Use "recognised" followed directly by the object of recognition. For example, "The committee has recognised the need for change."

What can I say instead of "has recognised to"?

You can use alternatives like "has acknowledged", "has identified", or "has realized" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has recognised to" or "has recognised"?

"Has recognised" is the correct and grammatically sound option. "Has recognised to" is not a standard English construction.

Is "has recognised to" ever correct in English?

No, the phrase "has recognised to" is not considered correct in standard English usage. It's best to avoid this construction.