has not provided

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not provided" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express the idea that someone has failed to provide something. For example: "The manufacturer has not provided any proof of quality for the product."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

In practice, he has not provided one.

The Economist

NBC has not provided much help.

The New York Times

This campaign has not provided it.

The Economist

Mr. Stevenson has not provided it.

The New York Times

Barack Obama has not provided it.

The Guardian - Business

(Koons has not provided a comment).

The Guardian - Arts

Santorum has not provided an acceptable alternative.

The Guardian - Opinion

His family has not provided further details.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

The government has not provided an update since.

The Guardian

He has not provided and has not offered to provide financial support for Ms. Schreiber's child.

Huffington Post

Despite multiple attempts at communication with to resolve the issue, TfL has not provided any guidance.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not provided", ensure clarity regarding what was expected to be provided and by whom. This prevents ambiguity and strengthens the statement's impact.

Common error

Avoid using "has not provided" when a simple past tense like "did not provide" is more appropriate. "Has not provided" implies a continuing lack of provision up to the present, while "did not provide" refers to a specific past event.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not provided" functions as a negative perfect tense verb phrase. It indicates the absence of a completed action of providing something up to the present moment. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has not provided" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to indicate a lack of delivery or supply. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for a variety of contexts, particularly in news, academic, and formal business settings. While it is "very common", ensure you are using it with the correct tense and that you clearly define what was expected to be provided. Remember to choose appropriate alternatives like "did not give" or "failed to supply" for nuanced meanings. Using "has not provided" effectively will enhance the clarity and precision of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not give

Replaces "has not provided" with a simpler verb and past tense, indicating a lack of giving something.

failed to supply

Emphasizes the failure to furnish or make available something that was needed or expected.

did not furnish

Uses a more formal verb to indicate that something was not supplied.

left unsupplied

Highlights the state of being without something that should have been provided.

has not furnished

Uses a synonym of provide for a more formal tone.

omitted to provide

Indicates a deliberate or negligent failure to provide something.

neglected to give

Suggests carelessness or oversight in failing to provide something.

did not offer

Focuses on the absence of an offer to provide something.

was unable to provide

Indicates a lack of capacity or ability to provide something.

could not supply

Emphasizes the inability to provide something due to circumstances or limitations.

FAQs

What does "has not provided" mean?

The phrase "has not provided" indicates that someone or something was expected to give, supply, or furnish something but failed to do so. It implies a lack of delivery or offering.

How can I use "has not provided" in a sentence?

You can use "has not provided" to state that a person, organization, or system has failed to deliver something expected. For instance, "The company has not provided sufficient evidence to support its claims."

What are some alternatives to "has not provided"?

You can use alternatives like "did not give", "failed to supply", or "did not furnish" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "did not provide" or "has not provided"?

The choice between "did not provide" and "has not provided" depends on the context. "Did not provide" refers to a specific instance in the past, while "has not provided" implies a continuing state up to the present. For example: "The document did not provide the required information" vs. "The government has not provided adequate support for the program".