has no land

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has no land" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where a person, entity, or country does not possess any territory or property. Example: "The nomadic tribe has no land to call their own, moving from place to place in search of resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

But Mr. Dokotera still has no land of his own.

The New York Times

Unlike Switzerland it has no land borders or linguistic connections with its neighbours.

The Guardian

"Nassau has no land, and in Suffolk it is too far out".

The New York Times

Biel, who brought nothing with her and has no land to plant, is feeding her children boiled leaves.

The Guardian

She complained that her husband has no land to call his own and spends his time fixing up houses on the island for cash.

The New York Times

It's unlikely to affect the relatively few asylum-seekers who enter the UK, which has no land border with Europe and retains border checks.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

For example, heating with biomass from wooden chips as a waste from forest cultivation has no land-use competition at all, but biomass being harvested from maize has a 100% competition factor.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

We have no land.

The Guardian

Women had no land rights.

The Guardian

I have no land, no houses, nothing.

The New York Times

We have no land to plant.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing economic or social inequality, use "has no land" to highlight the lack of access to a fundamental resource for livelihood.

Common error

Avoid using "has no land" when you mean "has no grounding" or "lacks a foundation in reality". The former refers to physical property, while the latter refers to a lack of stability or realism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no land" functions primarily as a descriptive phrase, indicating the absence of land ownership. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which confirms its grammatical correctness. It's used to describe individuals, communities, or even abstract entities that lack this essential resource.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has no land" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe the absence of land ownership. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's appropriate for various contexts, particularly those dealing with economic disparities, social issues, or property rights. While "has no land" can be used in formal writing, be mindful of potentially more precise alternatives like "lacks land ownership" depending on the specific context. Common errors to avoid include confusing it with phrases like "has no grounding". In summary, while it isn't the most frequent expression, when referring to a lack of ownership in land, it's a solid choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is landless

This alternative is a single-word adjective describing the state of not owning land.

holds no land

This alternative simply states the fact that someone does not possess any land.

does not own land

This alternative uses a more formal and explicit construction to convey the lack of land ownership.

lacks land ownership

This alternative emphasizes the absence of the legal right to possess land.

is not a landowner

This alternative focuses on the individual's status as not being a land-owning person.

is without property

This alternative broadens the scope to include any type of property, not just land.

possesses no territory

This alternative implies a larger scale, referring to a country or entity without any territorial control.

is dispossessed of land

This alternative implies a loss of previously held land, often through force or injustice.

has been deprived of land

This alternative emphasizes the action of being stripped of land ownership.

is bereft of land

This alternative employs a more literary and emotive tone to express the lack of land.

FAQs

How can I rephrase the sentence "He has no land"?

You can use alternatives like "He "is landless"", "He "does not own land"", or "He "lacks land ownership"" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it appropriate to use "has no land" in formal writing?

Yes, "has no land" is appropriate for formal writing, especially when discussing topics related to economics, social justice, or property rights. However, consider the context and choose the most precise term; alternatives like "lacks land ownership" may be more suitable in certain formal situations.

What is the difference between "has no land" and "is landless"?

"Has no land" is a phrase that describes the state of not owning land. "Is landless" is a single-word adjective that means the same thing. The choice between them often depends on the desired style and flow of the sentence.

When is it more appropriate to say someone "has no land" versus "owns no property"?

Use "has no land" when specifically referring to the lack of land ownership, particularly in agricultural or rural contexts. Use "owns no property" when referring to a broader lack of assets, including buildings, vehicles, and other possessions.