Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(22)
It pretends to a political hegemony it no longer possesses and has no currently credible strategy for acquiring.
Rather, the court ruled that marijuana's listing by Congress as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act meant that it "has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States".
In the US – even in the 23 states, along with the District of Columbia and Guam, that have legalized marijuana to one degree or another – the drug is still federally listed as a Schedule I drug, meaning it has "no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse".
Chuck Rosenberg, the acting head of the D.E.A., wrote in the decision that marijuana would remain a Schedule 1 drug because "it has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision, and a high potential for abuse".
Given the stakes, it is unconscionable that high-CBD marijuana continues to be federally classified as a Schedule I drug, meaning that it has "no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse", and the mere act of transporting it from Colorado to another state – even one where it has been legalized – is illegal.
But the Supreme Court, in an 8-to-0 decision, ruled that Congress, by classifying marijuana as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, had determined that marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States".
Similar(37)
That defines the drug as having "no currently accepted medical use", and places it in the same category as heroin and ecstasy.
They are also said to have "no currently accepted medical use".
According to the federal classification, Schedule I drugs have "no currently accepted medical use".
It is defined as having no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.
Drugs that are in this category are considered not only highly abusive but also have no currently accepted medical use.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com