has no consequence on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has no consequence on" is not correct in standard English; the correct form is "has no consequence for" or "has no effect on." You can use it when discussing the impact or significance of one thing on another, but it should be phrased correctly.
Example: "The decision made by the committee has no consequence for the overall outcome of the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

"You think that has no consequence on our game?

The Guardian - Sport

The intercalation of lithium has no consequence on the reactivity of the surface.

Catalysis Today

Otherwise, you're engaging in a form of rhetorical narcissism and ideological self-preoccupation that has no consequence on the material conditions of actually existing poor people".

The Guardian - Opinion

Their comparison shows that the discrepancies are located in the accessible to solvent part of the ligand, which has no consequence on the results.

Journal of Cheminformatics

It should be reminded that in the algorithm, whenever a parking is not saturated, its saturation time is assigned the value of the maximum preferred arrival time in the demand domain, as it has no consequence on the assignment process.

European Transport Research Review

If the spindle is normal, the bypass of the checkpoint has no consequence on cell viability.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

France Télécom said in a statement that it "acknowledges the decision to place Stéphane Richard under formal investigation, but wishes to make it clear that this has no consequences on his current responsibilities.

The New York Times

The windowing effect for UFMC is different from GFDM as the windowing is applied on the receiver side, and has no consequences on the power spectral density of the transmitted signal.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This has no consequences on the results, but improves accuracy of study design reporting.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

In 52 cases (19.8% of IHT), equipment-related incidents had no consequence on the patient.

Annals of Intensive Care

Since such operations are dual and have no consequence on the performance of the system, they can be omitted at both ends for simulation purpose.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the phrases "has no effect on" or "has no impact on" for better grammatical correctness. While "has no consequence on" appears in some sources, it's often considered non-standard. Always double-check your grammar to ensure clarity and precision.

Common error

A frequent mistake is using the preposition "on" with "consequence." The correct preposition to use is "for". Therefore, instead of saying "has no consequence on", opt for the correct phrasing "has no consequence for". Or, you can substitute with "has no effect on", which is a standard and acceptable alternative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase, while present in some sources, functions to negate the influence or impact of one thing on another. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not grammatically correct and suggests alternatives like "has no effect on."

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

26%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "has no consequence on" is used to express a lack of impact or effect, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI recommends using alternatives like "has no effect on" or "has no impact on" for better grammatical correctness and clarity. While it appears across a variety of sources, predominantly in scientific and news contexts, opting for the suggested alternatives enhances the quality and precision of your writing. Remember to consider the context and choose the phrasing that best conveys your intended meaning while adhering to standard grammatical conventions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has no impact on

Replaces "consequence" with "impact", a direct synonym, maintaining the overall structure and meaning.

has no effect on

Substitutes "consequence" with "effect", offering a more common and grammatically sound alternative.

does not affect

Changes the structure to an active voice, replacing "has no consequence on" with a simpler, direct statement.

has no ramifications for

Replaces "consequence" with "ramifications" and "on" with "for", offering a more formal and correct phrasing.

has no bearing on

Uses "bearing" to indicate relevance or influence, slightly altering the nuance but keeping the core meaning intact.

is irrelevant to

Expresses a lack of connection or importance, shifting the focus to irrelevance rather than consequence.

makes no difference to

Highlights the lack of change or alteration, emphasizing the absence of any discernible impact.

is immaterial to

Indicates that something is not important or relevant, providing a formal alternative with a slightly different connotation.

does not matter to

This alternative is more direct and informal, emphasizing the lack of importance to something else.

doesn't influence

Focuses specifically on the lack of influence, narrowing the scope of the statement.

FAQs

What are some correct alternatives to "has no consequence on"?

Better alternatives include "has no effect on", "has no impact on", or "has no bearing on". These options are grammatically sound and widely accepted.

Is it grammatically correct to say "has no consequence on"?

While you might find the phrase "has no consequence on" in some texts, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The proper phrasing is "has no consequence for". However, alternatives such as "has no effect on" are preferable.

When should I use "has no consequence for" instead of "has no consequence on"?

Always use "has no consequence for". The preposition "on" is incorrect in this context. If you're looking for alternative phrases, consider using "has no effect on" or "does not affect".

What's the difference between "has no effect on" and "has no consequence for"?

While both phrases convey a lack of impact, "has no effect on" is generally more common and widely accepted. "Has no consequence for" is grammatically correct and also suitable, but "has no consequence on" should be avoided.