has no been

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has no been" is not correct in English and cannot be used in written form.
It seems to be a mistaken combination of "has not been" or "have not been," which are used to indicate the absence of an action or state. Example: "She has not been to the new restaurant yet."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

German officials say there has no been a change in their stance, but proponents see a softening in tone that could signal a new openness.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Ah've no been tae bed yet.

The New Yorker

Mr. Jackson has no problem being an anomaly.

The New York Times

had no trouble being delivered.

The New York Times - Arts

Having no props is fine too.

WikiHow

He has had no need to be.

The Economist

"He's had no football.

BBC

"No, there has been no care".

Huffington Post

No has been reported hurt.

Los Angeles Times

No secrets have been revealed; no one has been libelled.

The New Yorker

"There has been no water, no electricity.

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "has not been" or "have not been" instead of "has no been". The latter is grammatically incorrect and can confuse your reader.

Common error

Be careful not to mix up the negation in present perfect tense. The correct structure is "has/have + not + been", not "has + no + been". For example, say "The problem "has not been" solved" instead of the ungrammatical "The problem "has no been" solved".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no been" is an incorrect grammatical construction. It attempts to negate a present perfect form but fails to do so according to standard English grammar rules. As Ludwig AI notes, this phrase should be avoided in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

17%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Science

33%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has no been" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. The correct way to express negation in the present perfect tense is by using "has not been" or "have not been", depending on the subject. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase should not be used. Remember to use alternative phrases like ""has not been"", ""have not been"", or ""has never been"" to convey the intended meaning accurately and effectively. Pay close attention to grammatical accuracy to ensure clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has not been

Negates the present perfect tense, indicating that something did not happen or exist.

hasn't been

Contraction of "has not been", providing a more casual tone.

have not been

Plural form of the negation in present perfect tense.

haven't been

Contraction of "have not been", providing a more casual tone for plural subjects.

has never been

Indicates that something has not happened at any time in the past.

it has not been

Specifies that 'it' has not undergone a certain state or action.

there has been no

Emphasizes the absence of something.

there's been no

Informal contraction emphasizing absence, suitable for casual conversation.

there have been no

Plural form emphasizing the absence of multiple things.

there've been no

Plural informal contraction to express absence.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the present perfect negative with "be"?

The correct structure is "has/have + not + been". For a singular subject, use "has not been", as in "She "has not been" to Paris". For a plural subject, use "have not been", as in "They "have not been" invited".

Is "has no been" ever correct in English?

No, "has no been" is not a correct grammatical construction in standard English. The correct way to express negation in the present perfect tense is by using "has not been" or "have not been".

What's the difference between "has not been" and "has never been"?

"Has not been" simply negates that something has happened or existed up to the present. "Has never been" emphasizes that something has not happened at any time in the past. For example, "He "has not been" late this week" versus "He "has never been" late since he started working here".

What are some alternatives to "there "has no been"" that correctly express absence?

Instead of "there "has no been"", use "there has been no" for singular or uncountable nouns, or "there have been no" for plural nouns. For example, "There there has been no rain" or "There there have been no complaints".