has meet with

USAGE SUMMARY

"has meet with" is not considered correct or usable in written English.
The correct phrase is "has met with," which can be used when referring to someone having a physical interaction with another person, or when talking about a person having an encounter or interaction with something. Example: My friend has met with many successful businesspeople during her career.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

He noted that Pascrell has held several town hall meetings and has meet with local officials, along with distributing government grants.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

All this has met with furious protests.

The Economist

Mr. Perry has met with Donald H. Rumsfeld.

The New York Times

Mrs. Keckley has met with great success".

The New York Times

Neither tack has met with much success.

The Economist

That has met with limited success.

The New York Times

The play has met with mixed reviews.

The New York Times

Corbyn has met with extremists.

The Guardian - Opinion

The strategy has met with some success.

The New York Times

The move has met with mixed results.

The Guardian

This idea has met with less support.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form 'met' instead of 'meet' when using the auxiliary verb 'has'. The correct phrase is "has met with".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb 'meet' after 'has'. Remember that the correct past participle is 'met'. So, always use "has met with" instead of the incorrect form "has meet with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has meet with" is intended to function as a present perfect construction indicating that someone has interacted or encountered another person or thing. However, it is grammatically incorrect; Ludwig AI identifies the correct form as "has met with".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

20%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Encyclopedias

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has meet with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "has met with". While Ludwig identifies its presence in various contexts such as News & Media, Science, Formal & Business its infrequent usage and grammatical error suggest avoiding it in formal writing. Remember to use "has met with" to properly convey past interactions. Ludwig AI flags "has meet with" as incorrect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has met with

Corrected form of the phrase, using the correct past participle of 'meet'.

met with

Omits the auxiliary verb 'has', suitable for simple past tense contexts.

had a meeting with

Rephrases the interaction as a formal meeting.

held discussions with

Emphasizes a more detailed and potentially lengthy interaction.

conferred with

Implies a consultation or exchange of opinions.

consulted with

Focuses on seeking advice or guidance.

had an encounter with

Highlights a brief or unexpected interaction.

came into contact with

Suggests a casual or unintentional meeting.

engaged with

Implies active participation or involvement during the interaction.

interacted with

General term for communication or activity between individuals.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say someone interacted with another person?

The correct phrase is "has met with". The form "has meet with" is grammatically incorrect.

How to use "has met with" in a sentence?

Use "has met with" to indicate that someone has had an interaction or encounter. For example: "The president has met with several world leaders this week."

What can I say instead of "has meet with"?

Since "has meet with" is grammatically incorrect, use "has met with" or alternatives like "had a meeting with" or "consulted with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has meet with" or "has met with"?

"Has met with" is the correct form. "Has meet with" is a grammatical error because it uses the base form of the verb instead of the past participle.