has every right

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has every right" is perfectly correct and usable in written English.
It is often used when one wishes to emphasize that someone has a valid entitlement to do or say something. For example, "He has every right to express his opinion on the situation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She has every right to be.

Independent

He has every right to be.

The Economist

It has every right to do that.

The Economist

"She has every right to testify.

The New York Times

She has every right to be scared.

The Guardian - Sport

He has every right to feel proud.

The Guardian - Sport

It has every right to be free.

The New York Times

He has every right to do that.

The New York Times

Then again, he has every right to.

The Guardian - Music

Congress has every right to investigate you.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

The feds, the judge ruled, had "every right to complain".

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has every right" to assert that an individual or entity is completely justified in their actions or beliefs, especially when those actions or beliefs might be questioned by others.

Common error

Avoid using "has every right" to imply absolute impunity. While someone may be justified in their actions, they are still accountable for the consequences. Ensure that using the phrase does not suggest they are above ethical or legal considerations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has every right" functions as an assertion of entitlement or justification. It emphasizes that someone is completely justified in taking a particular action, holding a specific belief, or possessing something. Ludwig's analysis confirms its correct usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

87%

Science

6%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has every right" is a versatile and frequently used phrase that serves to assert entitlement or justification. Ludwig AI confirms its proper grammatical structure and wide applicability across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While the phrase carries a neutral tone suitable for formal and informal settings, it's crucial to ensure that using "has every right" doesn't inadvertently imply absolute impunity or disregard for ethical/legal considerations. Related phrases include "is entitled to", "is justified in", and "is within their rights to", offering alternative ways to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is entitled to

This alternative focuses on the entitlement aspect, implying a legitimate claim to something.

is justified in

This alternative emphasizes the justification or reason behind an action or feeling.

is within their rights to

This option highlights that an action is legally or morally permissible.

is authorized to

Focuses on the formal permission or authorization to do something.

is permitted to

Indicates that someone has been given permission or is allowed to do something.

can legitimately

Emphasizes the legitimate or lawful nature of an action.

is morally correct to

Implies an action aligns with ethical or moral principles.

is correct in

Suggests the action or feeling is accurate or appropriate.

possesses the prerogative to

Highlights a special right or privilege to take a certain action.

is empowered to

Focuses on the authority or power granted to someone to act.

FAQs

How can I use "has every right" in a sentence?

You can use "has every right" to indicate that someone is completely justified in their actions or opinions. For example, "She "is entitled to" her privacy after such a difficult ordeal".

What are some alternatives to saying "has every right"?

Alternatives include phrases like "is justified in", ""is entitled to"", or "is within their rights to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "has every right" in formal writing?

Yes, "has every right" is suitable for formal writing, especially when arguing a point or defending a position. It clearly asserts a justified entitlement. It is often used also in informal contexts.

What's the difference between "has every right" and "should be allowed to"?

"Has every right" implies a strong sense of justification or entitlement, while "should be allowed to" suggests permission or lack of impediment. The former is stronger and indicates inherent justification, whereas the latter simply implies no explicit prohibition.