has clearly has

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has clearly has" is not correct in written English due to the repetition of "has." It cannot be used in any context as it stands, as it is grammatically incorrect.
Example: "She has clearly has a talent for painting." (should be corrected to "She has clearly a talent for painting.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"We can't let the country be run by an organization that has clearly has for years been carrying out acts of anarchy".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Belichick has clearly had trouble drafting defensive backs and receivers.

The New York Times

Williams, seeded seventh, has clearly had more daunting early draws.

The New York Times - Sports

The turmoil has clearly had an impact on public trust.

The Guardian

The labor strife has clearly had an effect on fan interest, Goodell said.

The New York Times - Sports

Is that fair?The space age has clearly had a big impact.

The Economist

Harris has clearly had enormous and elaborate fun creating her version of the Norse world view.

The Guardian - Books

Mr. Chavez's generosity has clearly had a domestic political cost, though.

The New York Times

The UCS talk has clearly had a powerful impact on the Chantry boys.

The Guardian

But Mr. Bloomberg has clearly had more than theoretical concerns about the issue from the start.

The New York Times

But he has clearly had a change of heart, having spent seven years preparing a massive autobiography.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase “has clearly has” in your writing as it is grammatically incorrect. Always double-check for repeated auxiliary verbs.

Common error

Ensure you are not repeating auxiliary verbs unnecessarily. In phrases like “has clearly has”, remove the extra “has” to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase “has clearly has�� functions as an incorrect verb phrase. Ludwig AI indicates this is due to the repetition of the auxiliary verb “has”. The intended function is to express that someone or something possesses a quality or has experienced something demonstrably.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase “has clearly has” is grammatically incorrect due to the redundant use of the auxiliary verb "has". Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While the intention might be to emphasize certainty, the incorrect grammar undermines the message. It's best to use alternatives like "clearly has" or "has evidently" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Although examples of this phrase appear in news sources, they represent errors and should not be emulated. Always proofread to avoid such mistakes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clearly has

Omits the redundant 'has', correcting the grammatical error.

has definitely had

Replaces 'clearly' with 'definitely' and uses the correct 'had' after 'has'.

has certainly had

Substitutes 'clearly' with 'certainly', correcting the grammatical structure.

obviously has

Uses 'obviously' in place of 'clearly', removing the repeated 'has'.

plainly has

Replaces 'clearly' with 'plainly' to avoid repetition.

undeniably has

Uses 'undeniably' to convey a similar meaning without grammatical error.

unequivocally has

Replaces 'clearly' with 'unequivocally' for emphasis and grammatical correctness.

demonstrably has

Employs 'demonstrably' to replace 'clearly' while fixing the grammar.

patently has

Substitutes 'clearly' with 'patently', correcting the repeated 'has'.

unmistakably has

Uses 'unmistakably' to replace 'clearly', avoiding the grammatical mistake.

FAQs

Why is "has clearly has" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "has clearly has" is incorrect because it repeats the auxiliary verb 'has'. The correct form is to use 'has' once, such as in the phrase "clearly has".

What are some alternatives to "has clearly has" that are grammatically correct?

Grammatically sound alternatives include phrases like "clearly has", "has evidently", or "has obviously". These options avoid the repetition of 'has'.

How can I avoid making the mistake of repeating auxiliary verbs in my writing?

Always proofread your writing to catch any instances of repeated auxiliary verbs. Pay close attention to phrases containing adverbs like 'clearly', 'definitely', or 'certainly', which can sometimes lead to this error.

Is there any context in which "has clearly has" would be acceptable?

No, there is no context in which "has clearly has" is grammatically acceptable in standard written English. It is always considered an error.