Sentence examples for has clearly explained from inspiring English sources

Most people say that Mr. Bush has clearly explained the goals of both the military action in Afghanistan and the war against terrorism in general.

The bank has clearly explained to investors and regulators how it will reach compliance with the new rules ahead of schedule, he added.

More than half of Democrats, but just 19percentt of Republicans, said the president has clearly explained why the U.S. should launch airstrikes against Syria.

This study has clearly explained the weak recognition of H. pylori flagellin through TLR5 as an important immune evasion process of this long-term colonizing pathogen.

Bloomberg should have clearly explained that it had been unable to confirm the release or get a comment from the company, he said.

"He said he's about 70percentt satisfied," Ms. Sato said, adding that the lawyer had clearly explained both advantageous and disadvantageous elements of the man's situation.

"The partners have clearly explained that this decision was based on pressures elsewhere in their businesses, and not any doubts about the role of nuclear in UK's energy future," he said.

Charles Hendry, Britain's energy minister, said the withdrawal by the two German companies was "clearly very disappointing, but the partners have clearly explained that this decision was based on pressures elsewhere in their businesses and not on any doubts about the role of nuclear in U.K. energy future".

Charles Hendry, the energy minister, moved quickly to reassure the wider industry, saying: "The partners have clearly explained that this decision was based on pressures elsewhere in their businesses and not any doubts about the role of nuclear in UK's energy future.

Fisher's books and reports represent some of the clearest writing in the discipline of economics; he had the intellect to use mathematics in virtually all his theories and the good sense to introduce it only after he had clearly explained the central principles.

Instead of saying he would leave it to "the experts" to decide what to do about tax cuts for the wealthy, he should have clearly explained to voters how important it is to the nation's long-term future to raise taxes on families making more than $250,000.