Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
has been verified with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "has been verified with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that information has been confirmed or checked against a source or authority. Example: "The data has been verified with the latest research findings to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(13)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The model has been verified with the experimental data.
This model has been verified with experimental CSR results.
The accuracy of the method has been verified with TCAD simulation results.
In addition, the model has been verified with ten Chinese expressway projects.
The model has been verified with several results obtained from the literature.
Primality in generated pattern by CA has been verified with Fermat Primality Test.
Science
The system has been verified with four dry nanomaterials: TiO2, ZnO, CuO and CNT bundles.
The approach has been verified with a case study for biomass available in Scotland.
Device functioning has been verified with sensors produced in a research laboratory.
The new method has been verified with the thoroughly investigated system n-hexyl alcohol.
Science
The accuracy of the result has been verified with root mean square error analysis.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "has been verified with", ensure the source or method of verification is clearly stated to enhance credibility.
Common error
Avoid using "has been verified with" without specifying how the verification was conducted or what evidence supports the claim. Clarity is key.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "has been verified with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject's validity or accuracy has been confirmed by a specified method, data, or source. Ludwig shows many examples where models or systems are verified using experimental data or testing.
Frequent in
Science
74%
News & Media
15%
Encyclopedias
3%
Less common in
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "has been verified with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, predominantly found in scientific and academic writing, but also present in news and media. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to assert the validity and reliability of a claim by explicitly referencing the method or source of verification. For maximum clarity, it's crucial to clearly state the method by which something was confirmed to solidify the statement’s credibility. While it is most often used in scientific contexts, it is a valuable element across a number of different types of sources for validating information and claims.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
has been validated by
Focuses on the act of confirming the accuracy or legitimacy of something through a specific process or standard.
has been confirmed through
Highlights the confirmation aspect, often implying a rigorous testing or examination process.
has been substantiated by
Emphasizes the provision of evidence to support the truth or validity of a claim.
has been corroborated with
Implies that the information has been supported or strengthened by additional sources or evidence.
has been authenticated using
Focuses on the process of proving that something is genuine or valid, often using a specific tool or method.
has been tested against
Highlights the process of evaluating something to determine its reliability and accuracy.
has been checked against
Suggests a simple verification process to ensure accuracy or compliance.
has been proven by
Indicates that something has been conclusively demonstrated to be true or accurate.
is consistent with
Implies that the information aligns with other established facts or theories.
aligns with
Similar to 'is consistent with', indicating agreement or correspondence between different elements.
FAQs
How can I use "has been verified with" in a sentence?
Use "has been verified with" to indicate that a piece of information or a claim has been confirmed or validated by a specific method or source. For example, "The model "has been verified with experimental data"".
What are some alternatives to "has been verified with"?
You can use alternatives like "has been confirmed with", "has been validated by", or "has been substantiated by" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is there a difference between "has been verified with" and "has been confirmed with"?
While both phrases indicate that something has been checked and found to be true, "has been verified with" often suggests a more formal or systematic process of checking, whereas "has been confirmed with" might imply a broader range of supporting evidence. The phrase has been confirmed with focuses on the confirmation aspect, often implying a rigorous testing or examination process.
What type of sources are appropriate to cite when using "has been verified with"?
When using "has been verified with", cite authoritative and reliable sources relevant to the claim you are making. This can include experimental data, published research, expert opinions, or official records. For example, "The system "has been verified with four dry nanomaterials": TiO2, ZnO, CuO and CNT bundles."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested