has been update

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been update" is not correct in English.
The correct form should be "has been updated." You can use it when referring to something that has undergone a change or revision in the past and is still relevant in the present. Example: "The software has been updated to improve performance and fix bugs."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Note: The original version of this article has been update after Uber told us that this is not its first acquisition.

TechCrunch

Note: The original version of this article has been update after Uber told us that this is not its first acquisition.

TechCrunch

But Microsoft has finally fixed its error and the Xbox LIVE Terms of Use and Code of Conduct has been update to be a bit more friendly.

TechCrunch

Note: The original version of this article has been update to clarify that Damore does not hold a PhD from Havard.

TechCrunch

This article has been update with a comment by Trump.

Huffington Post

This story has been update to include comments from @JaredTSwift.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

This has been updated.

The Guardian - Film

This post has been updated.

The New Yorker

My memory has been updated.

The New Yorker

It has been updated.

The Washington Post

In conclusion, on Sunday has been updated.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form of 'update,' which is 'updated,' in perfect tenses. Saying "has been update" is grammatically incorrect.

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb ('update') when the past participle ('updated') is required in perfect tenses. Always double-check verb forms in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been update" functions as part of a verb phrase, attempting to express a completed action in the present perfect passive voice. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect due to the use of the base form of the verb instead of the past participle.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Wiki

16%

Science

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "has been update" appears across various online sources, Ludwig AI correctly identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The proper form is "has been updated". Its intended purpose is to convey that something has been modified to a more current state, but the incorrect grammar detracts from its effectiveness. To ensure clarity and credibility, always use the correct past participle form. Remember, while similar phrases might exist, maintaining grammatical accuracy is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been updated

Corrects the grammatical error by using the past participle form of the verb.

was updated

Shifts the tense to simple past, implying a one-time update event.

has received an update

Rephrases using 'received an update' to clarify the action.

has been revised

Emphasizes a careful review and modification.

has been modified

Highlights alterations made to an original form.

has been amended

Suggests formal or legal changes.

has been corrected

Indicates the fixing of errors or inaccuracies.

has been adjusted

Implies fine-tuning or minor alterations.

has been refined

Suggests improvements to quality or precision.

has been refreshed

Conveys a sense of renewal or revitalization.

FAQs

How do I correctly use "has been updated" in a sentence?

Use "has been updated" when you want to say that something was modified at some point in the past and is still in its modified state. For example: "The software "has been updated" with the latest security patches."

What's the difference between "has been updated" and "was updated"?

"Has been updated" implies a continuous relevance to the present, whereas "was updated" simply states a past action with no direct implication for the present. Example: "The document "was updated" last year" versus "The app "has been updated" to improve user experience."

Is it ever correct to say "has been update"?

No, "has been update" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct form is "has been updated". Using the correct past participle is essential for clear and effective communication.

What are some alternatives to "has been updated" that convey a similar meaning?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "has been revised", "has been modified", or "has received an update" to convey the same general idea of something being made current.