has been identified to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been identified to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where something has been recognized or determined, but the phrase is incomplete and awkward. Example: "The issue has been identified to be a significant concern for the team."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No attorney has been identified to speak on Bryant's behalf.

The Washington Post

Nigel Pearson, the Newcastle United assistant manager, has been identified to work alongside him.

The Guardian - Sport

The composition of the film has been identified to be NbO2 and different forms of Nb2O5.

Electrochimica Acta

Crack closure has been identified to be one of the main interaction effects.

International Journal of Fatigue

'K' means clustering algorithm has been identified to delineate KMA into 'K' number of clusters.

Cities

Where it has been identified to be such an issue that they do Advertise help on a regular basis.

Harvard University

Energy consumption in buildings has been identified to contribute up to 40% of the total world.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Also, an effective method has been identified to improve methane conversion efficiency.

Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification

In Mexico, just 54% of the reported Pleistocene Bison material has been identified to species.

Journal of South American Earth Sciences

Particularly, the presence of liquid-air interfaces has been identified to trigger the formation of large protein particles.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Taper corrosion has been identified to be a major concern in total hip arthroplasty during the past years.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "has been identified as" instead of "has been identified to" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "to" after "identified". The correct preposition is "as". "The problem has been identified as a lack of resources" is correct, while "The problem has been identified to a lack of resources" is incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been identified to" functions as part of a passive construction where something is being recognized or classified. However, it's grammatically flawed. Ludwig AI identifies it as incorrect and suggests using "has been identified as" instead.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

15%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has been identified to" is widely used across various domains like science, news, and academia, as indicated by Ludwig's examples. However, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect, recommending the use of ""has been identified as"" instead. Despite its frequent appearance, especially in formal contexts, using the correct phrasing enhances clarity and credibility. It's crucial to recognize and avoid this common grammatical error in writing to maintain professionalism and accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been identified as

Replaces the preposition 'to' with 'as', creating a grammatically correct and more common construction.

has been recognized as

Emphasizes the act of recognition rather than simple identification.

has been determined to be

Highlights a formal determination or conclusion about something.

was found to be

Shifts the focus to the discovery of a particular characteristic or property.

it is known to be

Implies widespread knowledge or acceptance of a fact.

has been established as

Suggests a firm or definite confirmation of something.

has been classified as

Focuses on the categorization of something into a specific group or type.

has been shown to be

Indicates that evidence or research supports a particular conclusion.

has been pinpointed as

Emphasizes precision in identifying a specific cause or factor.

has been designated as

Suggests a formal appointment or assignment of a role or status.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "has been identified to"?

The correct and more common way to phrase this is "has been identified as". For example, "The cause of the error has been identified "has been identified as" a software bug".

Can I use "has been identified to" in formal writing?

It's best to avoid "has been identified to" in formal writing. Opt for the grammatically correct alternative, ""has been identified as"", to maintain a professional tone.

What are some alternatives to "has been identified to" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, you can use phrases like "has been determined to be", "was found to be", or "has been shown to be" depending on the context. Always prioritize clarity and precision.

Is there a difference in meaning between "has been identified to" and "has been identified as"?

While the intended meaning might be similar, "has been identified to" is grammatically incorrect. ""has been identified as"" is the standard and correct way to express that something has been recognized or determined to be something else.