has been harm

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been harm" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an incorrect construction and does not convey a clear meaning. An example of a correct usage could be: "The situation has caused harm to the community."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"We have substantial proof and evidence that there has been harm done by outside interference," said Jonathan Parker, the state party's executive director.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

No detainee has been harmed.

The Economist

Consumer purchasing power has been harmed.

The New York Times

"The honour of Paris has been harmed," she whinged.

Independent

"None of us has been harmed," Mr. Abdi said.

The New York Times

So far there is no indication that anyone has been harmed by eating contaminated food.

The New York Times - Science

Ms Bachelet has been harmed by allegations concerning her son's business dealings.

The Economist

The other fish know that their school mate has been harmed.

The New York Times - Health

Both the US and UK have since acknowledged no one has been harmed.

The Guardian

No matter how old Danny Almonte is, he has been harmed by adults.

The New York Times - Sports

For all its claims of moral integrity, the Socialist party has been harmed, and the president weakened.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "has been harm". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "has caused harm" or "has resulted in harm" to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing.

Common error

The verb "harm" is typically used as a noun or a verb in the infinitive form. Using it directly after "has been" is grammatically incorrect. Use the correct form like "has been harmed" or rephrase the sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been harm" is grammatically incorrect. It attempts to use "harm" as a noun directly after the auxiliary verbs "has been", where a past participle is required. As Ludwig AI points out, this construction does not follow standard English grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been harm" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both written and spoken English. Ludwig AI flags this as incorrect. Effective alternatives include "has caused harm" or "<a href="/s/has+resulted+in+harm", which convey the intended meaning of damage or injury in a grammatically sound manner. It's important to use correct verb forms to ensure clarity and credibility in communication, regardless of the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has caused harm

Replaces the passive voice with an active construction, indicating direct causation.

has proven harmful

Highlights the demonstrated nature of the harm.

has resulted in damage

Substitutes "harm" with "damage", focusing on physical or measurable negative effects.

has done damage

Uses "done" to emphasize the completed action of causing harm.

has led to injury

Emphasizes physical harm or impairment as a consequence.

has negatively impacted

A more contemporary phrasing indicating adverse effects.

has inflicted damage

Uses a stronger verb ("inflicted") to suggest deliberate or forceful harm.

has been detrimental

Uses a formal term to describe something causing harm

has had a detrimental effect

Focuses on the negative impact or influence rather than direct harm.

has created problems

Offers a more general term for negative consequences, suitable for broader contexts.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "harm" in a sentence?

Use "harm" as a noun (e.g., "to cause harm") or use the verb "harm" in the passive voice (e.g., "has been harmed").

What can I say instead of "has been harm"?

You can use alternatives like "has caused harm", "has resulted in harm", or "has been harmed" depending on the intended meaning.

Which is correct, "has been harm" or "has been harmed"?

"Has been harmed" is the correct phrasing. "Has been harm" is grammatically incorrect.

How can I avoid grammatical errors when talking about causing damage or injury?

Always ensure the verb form is correct. Use active constructions like "caused damage" or passive constructions like "was harmed".