has been criticized

USAGE SUMMARY

"has been criticized" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about a person, idea, or thing that has been the subject of criticism or disapproval. For example, "The new policy has been criticized for not doing enough to protect the environment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

TED has been criticized for these tendencies.

The New Yorker

Mr. Smolan has been criticized before.

The New York Times

But the plan has been criticized.

The New York Times

But the department's work on the topic has been criticized.

The New York Times

The Köppen classification has been criticized on many grounds.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The new book has been criticized for using similar methods.

The New Yorker

Surprisingly, Mr. Hollande's policy has been criticized as profligate.

The New York Times

The France family has been criticized as imperialistic and secretive.

The New York Times - Sports

The product, though, has been criticized for its inaccuracies.

The New York Times

And he has been criticized widely for exaggerated expressivity.

The New York Times - Arts

Xiaomi has been criticized as something of an Apple knockoff.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has been criticized", clearly state the reasons for the criticism to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "has been criticized" without specifying who is doing the criticizing. Provide context by naming the critics or their affiliation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been criticized" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has received negative feedback or disapproval. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a common and correct usage in English, illustrated by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has been criticized" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to express negative evaluation or disapproval. According to Ludwig AI, its proper usage involves indicating that a subject has received criticism. The phrase appears frequently in news and media, as well as scientific contexts, with a generally neutral register. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to specify the reasons for the criticism and avoid vague attribution. Alternatives like "has been challenged" or "has drawn criticism" can be used to express similar sentiments with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has drawn criticism

Indicates that the subject has attracted negative feedback.

has been condemned

Emphasizes a stronger level of disapproval or moral indignation.

has been challenged

Suggests the idea or action has been questioned or disputed.

has been questioned

Focuses on doubts or uncertainties surrounding the subject.

has been rebuked

Highlights an official or formal expression of disapproval.

has faced backlash

Implies a strong negative reaction, often from the public.

has been disapproved of

Indicates a lack of acceptance or agreement.

has come under fire

Suggests intense scrutiny and criticism, often in a public forum.

was not well received

Indicates an unfavorable response or negative reaction.

met with disapproval

Highlights the negative sentiment or disagreement it encountered.

FAQs

What does "has been criticized" mean?

The phrase "has been criticized" means that someone or something has been subjected to disapproval or negative comments. It implies that fault has been found or shortcomings have been identified.

What can I say instead of "has been criticized"?

You can use alternatives like "has been challenged", "has drawn criticism", or "has come under fire", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How do I use "has been criticized" in a sentence?

You can use "has been criticized" to indicate that a particular subject has received negative feedback or disapproval. For example: "The new policy has been criticized for its potential impact on small businesses."

Is it better to say "has been criticized" or "was criticized"?

Both "has been criticized" and "was criticized" are grammatically correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. "Has been criticized" (present perfect) implies that the criticism is still relevant or ongoing, while "was criticized" (simple past) suggests that the criticism occurred in the past and may no longer be a significant issue.