has been cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been cost" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of verb forms and should be rephrased for clarity. Example: "The project has cost more than we anticipated."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Up to now, the main drawback has been cost.

The New York Times

But the decisive driver of reform has been cost.

The Guardian - Opinion

The more likely reason for slow development, however, has been cost.

Encyclopedia Britannica

And maybe the biggest obstacle to nuclear power has been cost, not pesky enviros.

The New York Times

"If it's true, it's a huge breakthrough, because the main problem for battery cars has been cost," David Cole, chairman emeritus of the Center for Automotive Research, a nonprofit research group based in Michigan, said in a telephone interview.

The New York Times

Firms with a strategic hole plug it by hiring key people, or if that is not quick enough, whole teams.The result has been cost inflation that would make the movie industry blush, especially in such hot areas as technology and telecoms and especially for analysts, since they know something about the businesses for which the investment bankers are pitching.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The strike has been costing SWT £1.5 m a day in lost revenue.

The Guardian

The Pentagon estimates that the military occupation has been costing nearly $4 billion a month.

The New York Times

To put these numbers in perspective, the Iraq war has been costing roughly $200 billion a year.

The New York Times

A business group has estimated that the standoff has been costing local businesses about $5.4 million a day.

The New York Times

With about 130,000 troops now in Iraq, the Pentagon says the occupation has been costing about $4 billion a month.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing expenses, use grammatically correct phrases such as "has incurred costs", "has been expensive", or "has resulted in costs" to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "has been cost" as it's grammatically incorrect. Ensure the verb "cost" is used correctly in the past participle form (costed) or rephrase using alternative expressions that clearly convey the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been cost" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't serve a recognizable function in English. It appears to be an erroneous combination of verb forms. According to Ludwig AI, the phrasing is incorrect.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has been cost" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in all forms of writing. As Ludwig AI also confirms, it is not a valid or recognized expression in English. To express the idea of incurring expenses, consider using alternatives such as "has incurred costs", "has resulted in costs", or "has been expensive". Using correct grammar ensures clear and effective communication, enhancing your credibility and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been expensive

A straightforward and grammatically correct way of saying something's cost was high.

has incurred costs

Replaces "cost" as a noun with the verb "incurred", providing a grammatically correct structure to indicate the action of incurring expenses.

has resulted in costs

Uses "resulted in costs" to show that something has led to expenses, emphasizing the outcome rather than the direct action of costing.

has come at a cost

Indicates that something has required sacrifice or expenditure, often implying a negative consequence.

has involved expenditure

Employs "involved expenditure" to highlight that an activity or project necessitated spending money.

has carried a price tag

Uses a more figurative expression to indicate that something comes with a specific cost or financial implication.

has required investment

Shifts the focus to the necessity of putting money into something, framing it as an investment rather than a mere cost.

has proven costly

Highlights that something has turned out to be expensive, emphasizing the outcome over time.

has presented a financial challenge

Frames the cost as an obstacle or difficulty, rather than simply stating the expense.

has demanded resources

Focuses on the resources needed, including financial ones, emphasizing the broader implications of the cost.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct alternative to "has been cost"?

Instead of "has been cost", use phrases like "has incurred costs", "has resulted in costs", or "has been expensive" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.

How can I correctly express the idea of something incurring expenses?

You can use phrases such as "has involved expenditure", "has carried a price tag", or "has demanded resources" to describe the act of incurring expenses effectively.

Is "has been cost" ever appropriate in formal writing?

No, "has been cost" is not appropriate in formal writing due to its grammatical incorrectness. Always opt for grammatically sound alternatives.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when discussing financial implications?

Avoid using ungrammatical or ambiguous phrasing like "has been cost". Instead, use precise and grammatically correct language to ensure your message is clear and professional.