has been appointed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been appointed with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to convey that someone has been assigned a position or role. Example: "She has been appointed with the responsibility of leading the project team."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

A committee charged with reviewing the constitution has been appointed, with a prominent legal scholar, Tariq al-Bishri, at its head.

The Economist

A Data Safety and Adverse Event Monitoring Committee has been appointed with membership independent from the conduct of the trial.

BMC Pediatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Judge Stokes said Miss Gibrill had been appointed with the best of motives in mind, but had not been properly briefed on what to do.

The Guardian

All three of them arrived mid-season, and Brian Laws in particular appeared to have been appointed with a resigned return to the Championship in mind.

The Guardian - Sport

She had been appointed, with an annual pay and benefits package worth £500,000, after May's two earlier choices for the post also resigned prematurely.

The Guardian

Of the other clubs in the division that season, 220 managers have been appointed, with two of the clubs (Nottingham Forest and Southampton) making 17 apiece.

The Guardian - Sport

The former Villa manager and the ex-Manchester City chairman have been appointed with the club rooted to the bottom of the Premier League.

The Guardian - Sport

He refused to accept Ketumile Masire, a former president of Botswana, as the mediator in a political dialogue with Congo's many political forces, even though Mr Masire had been appointed with the agreement of all parties.

The Economist

Ross County have confirmed that Jim McIntyre has been appointed manager with Billy Dodds as his assistant.

BBC

The screenplay from The Theory of Everything writer-producer Anthony McCarten begins just days after Churchill has been appointed prime minister, with the new leader faced with the choice of making a deal with Hitler that will establish Britain as a virtual puppet state, or fighting on and risking likely defeat at the hands of the Nazis.

The Guardian - Film

The Scotsman's business editor, Peter MacMahon, has been appointed assistant editor with responsibility for comment, features and politics; with the Scotsman news editor Frank O'Donnell appointed assistant editor, group head of news.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that someone has been given a position or role, use the phrase "has been appointed to" followed by the specific role or responsibility. This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "has been appointed". The correct preposition to use is "to" to clearly indicate the role or responsibility the person has been assigned. For example, prefer "She has been appointed to the committee" over the incorrect "She has been appointed with the committee".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been appointed with" functions as part of a passive construction, aiming to describe the action of assigning someone a role or responsibility. However, Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is not standard English, typically used incorrectly when trying to convey assignment to a position.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been appointed with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. Ludwig AI confirms this, advising against its use. While it appears in some sources, including news and scientific contexts, the correct and preferred phrasing is "has been appointed to". When aiming for clarity and grammatical precision, especially in formal writing, it's best to use alternatives like "has been named", "has been selected for", or "has been designated". By avoiding this phrase, you ensure your writing remains credible and easy to understand.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been appointed to

Replaces "with" to the correct preposition "to" to indicate assignment to a role.

has been named

Focuses on the act of officially declaring someone for a role.

has been selected for

Emphasizes the choice or selection process for the appointment.

has been designated

Highlights the official assigning of a specific role or function.

has taken on the role of

Focuses on the assumption of duties and responsibilities.

has assumed the position of

Highlights the start of holding a formal position.

has been entrusted with

Emphasizes the aspect of trust and responsibility given with the appointment.

has been charged with

Focuses on the specific duties or responsibilities assigned.

has been assigned to

Indicates the act of being allocated or detailed to a specific task or role.

now holds the position of

States the current status of someone in a particular role.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say someone received a new position?

The correct way to phrase it is using "has been appointed to" followed by the role or task. For example, "He has been appointed to the board of directors" is grammatically sound.

Is it ever correct to use "has been appointed with"?

While occasionally seen, the phrasing "has been appointed with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use "has been appointed to" or alternatives for clarity and correctness.

What are some alternatives to "has been appointed to"?

Alternatives include "has been named", "has been selected for", or "has been designated", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Why is "has been appointed with" considered incorrect?

The preposition "with" doesn't logically connect the act of appointing to the role or responsibility. The preposition "to" is necessary to correctly show that someone is being assigned to a specific duty or position.