Sentence examples for has asserted repeatedly from inspiring English sources
President Bush has asserted repeatedly that intelligence is about protecting America and saving lives.
According to the onetime Renaissance employee, Mercer has asserted repeatedly that African-Americans were better off economically before the civil-rights movement.
Credit Suisse countersued and has asserted repeatedly in court that its Yellowstone loan wasn't unusual and didn't cause the club's troubles.
"None of us have been able to find any instance where before the invasion you came out against this war," Todd told Trump, who has asserted repeatedly on the campaign trail, in several debates and in numerous TV interviews that he was publicly against the invasion. .
The state rail authority repeatedly has asserted that it will not need a subsidy and that every high-speed system in the world operates without taxpayer assistance — despite significant evidence to the contrary.
He has insisted that Islamic State is "laughing" at Clinton and has even asserted, repeatedly, that she and President Obama help found the terrorist group.
The Russians have asserted that "Russia has repeatedly stressed the unacceptability of extrajudicial settling of scores and 'targeted killings.'" Javier Solana has noted that the "European Union has consistently condemned extrajudicial killings".
He should have, asserted Cleitophon.
Mr. Kennedy asserted repeatedly that he was not a theocrat.
[Page A15.] Questioned at length about the war for the first time since the former chief weapons inspector in Iraq said last month that Mr. Hussein did not have stockpiles of unconventional weapons, Mr. Bush acknowledged that he might have been wrong in asserting repeatedly before the invasion that Iraq possessed such weapons.
Van Inwagen founds his skeptical theism on his "extreme modal and moral skepticism" (skepticism about our ability to discern the relevant truths about morality and possibility, not skepticism about whether there are such truths; 1995, 84) and goes on to assert (repeatedly) that we have "no reason" to accept what he takes to be the crucial premise of the evidential argument from evil.
