Sentence examples for harmonization methods from inspiring English sources

Design harmonization methods developed in previous work are applied to create baseline and lightweight vehicle models of an internal combustion vehicle (ICV), hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV).

Harmonization methods that make it possible to compare or combine related data types for meta-analysis have proven to be very effective (29) and will always be an option.

Tire-pavement interaction/friction is discussed and the current harmonization method of friction measurements questioned.

In addition, the harmonization method might be utilized to reduce inter-scanner variability in measurement of SPECT/CT-derived absorbed doses in a variety of "theranostics" situations such as Tc-99m MAA SPECT/CT in Y-90 microsphere therapy, I-131 SPECT/CT in thyroid cancer therapy, and Lu-177-PSMA in prostate cancer therapy [32 34].

In the absence of such prior harmonization of methods, data can still be combined after careful examination of the communalities and differences between methods.

Despite the efforts for harmonization, TgAb methods cannot be used interchangeably.

In fact, over the years, there has been an improvement in the harmonization among methods, due to automation of the analytical procedures and the use of the same reference preparation (MRC 66/387) [10].

These discrepancies were not expected and not easily explained; in fact, in recent decades, there have been significant improvements in harmonization between methods [39], resulting from the high level of automation of analytical procedures and the use of the same reference preparation (IRP MRC 65/93).

However, in spite of the harmonization among methods provided by the use of an international standard preparation, the wide dispersion of quantitative results still observed in this study suggests the need for further efforts to better understand the cause of these discrepancies, focusing on TPO antigen preparations as the possible source of variability among different assays.

Moreover, in spite of the harmonization among methods, the wide dispersion of quantitative results, still observed in this study, suggests the need for further studies to better understand the cause of these discrepancies, focusing on TPO antigen preparation as the possible source of variability among different assays.

The lack of harmonization of methods and standards, and a donor-driven sector-specific focus does not give stakeholders policy makers the full range of information on which to act.