Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Although the refracture and reoperation were not statistically significant between the two groups, a number needed to harm was calculated as a worst case scenario.
Number needed to harm was calculated.
Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence interval for relevant adverse events and number needed to harm was calculated.
Number-needed-to-treat (or harm) was calculated using the method of Cook and Sackett [ 13] using the pooled number of observations.
Number-needed-to-treat (or harm) was calculated by the method of Cook and Sackett [ 22], using the pooled number of observations.
Relative benefit (or risk) was calculated using a fixed effects model [ 19] with no statistically significant difference between treatments assumed when the 95% confidence intervals included 1. Number-needed-to-treat (or harm) was calculated using the method of Cook and Sackett [ 20] using pooled observations.
Similar(51)
Confidence intervals for number needed to harm were calculated according to the Altman method.
Relative benefit (or risk) and number-needed-to-treat (or harm) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
Adverse event rates could be calculated for several adverse events, and numbers needed to harm were calculated, which were as low as 3 for constipation, and 5 for nausea and somnolence.
The number of harms is calculated by summing up how many of the five types of harms the students scored positively (score 0 5).
The number needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) was calculated for significant comparisons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com