Sentence examples for harm p from inspiring English sources

Our story this issue on Medtronic, "First, Do No Harm" (p. 170), reports that defective batteries affected 0.0001% of all recalled defibrillators.

In his own re-thinking of collective responsibility, Kenneth Shockley (2007) sets out to replace the Kantian notion of moral blameworthiness with a looser notion of "being at fault" that allows us to talk about a particular collective as "deserving of some kind of punishment apart from that meted out to its members for their role in harm" (p. 452).

However, non-medical staff were less likely to be involved in the changes resulting from event analyses describing patient harm (p < 0.05) The study provides some evidence of the potential of SEA to improve healthcare quality and safety.

Women with lower educational levels knew less about the beneficial effects of fluoride toothpaste (p < 0.01), fluoridated water (p < 0.001) and the ability of fluoride to prevent tooth decay without harm (p < 0.01).

The Specific Concern (P < 0.001, Mann Whitney), General Overuse (P < 0.001, Mann Whitney), and General Harm (P < 0.001, Mann Whitney) scores were significantly higher in the South Asian patients, indicating more negative views of medicine in general and with regard to their DMARDs in particular (Table  2).

Those with T1DM were significantly less likely, than No-DM, to self-harm (p < .012; d:1.03), have suicidal ideation (p < .030; d:0.80) and suicidal behaviour (p < .039; d:0.79) (see Additional file 1: Table S1).

There was strong evidence for an association between CP class and the majority of the outcomes (p ~0.001), but considerably weaker evidence for illicit drugs (p = 0.021), self-harm (p = 0.011) and gambling (p = 0.148).

The results for both years were broadly similar but significantly more 5th years felt that assessment of suicide risk and self-harm (p < 0.001), management of alcohol withdrawal (p < 0.001) and recognition and management of delirium (p < 0.001) were important than the 4th years.

In the multivariate analysis, the intervention group's improvement and the comparison group's decline were significant on perceived adequacy of drugs, supplies, and equipment; constructive feedback received from supervisor and co-workers; and feeling safe from physical harm (all P <0.01, except P <0.04 for equipment).

"There is no evidence that any professional was aware of this activity, nor did he make any threat to harm Child P or give any indication that he might do so.

The manipulation of potential harm significantly (p <.05) increased disgust and anxiety levels for both low and high hypnotizable participants, indicating the success of this manipulation.