Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The Harm assesses patients' beliefs about the perceived risk of medicines being harmful addictive (Harm, scores range from 5 25).
Similar(59)
We did not observe clinical benefit or harm assessed by the primary outcome in this largest and longest trial exploring both ART interruption and intensification in advanced MDR HIV infection with poor retreatment options.
Safety and exploratory outcomes include the measures of harm assessed by adverse events and measures of study engagements including attrition, adherence to intervention, and participation in co-interventions, respectively.
In the United States comparative effectiveness research (i.e. the direct comparison of existing health care interventions to determine which work best for which patients and which pose the greatest benefits and harms) assesses effectiveness in patients typical of day to day clinical care and therefore the focus is on 'real life' studies rather than RCTs.
The Harm scale assesses patients' beliefs about the perceived risk of medicines being harmful and addictive (Harm, scores range from 5 to 25).
A 5-item General Harm scale assesses beliefs about the intrinsic properties of medicines and the degree to which they are perceived as essentially harmful (with a higher score indicating stronger views about medicines being harmful).
Mitigation measures and residual risk are also broadly considered and a risk rating is calculated by multiplying likelihood (as assessed on a four-point scale from most unlikely to most likely) by the potential severity of injury or harm (similarly assessed on a four-point scale from trivial injury/harm to major injury/harm or death).
Dean and Barber [ 11] found that there was a clear relationship between potential harm as assessed using their scales and actual harm.
While association between alcohol consumption and harm is assessed mainly by individual-level data, aggregate time series data sometimes provide a feasible alternative.
Self-harm was assessed using the Self-Harm Behavior Questionnaire (SHBQ) [ 37], which is a self-report measure to assess the lifetime prevalence of self-harming behaviours including NSSI ('Have you ever hurt yourself on purpose?
This makes clear that harms are assessed relative to some baseline.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com