Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Possible responses are not at all true, hardly true, moderately true and exactly true yielding a total score between 10 and 40 points.
The patients rated the perceived severity of each symptom from 0 5 (never, hardly noticed, slightly, moderately, strongly, very strongly).
The patients could rate the perceived severity of each of these symptoms from 0 5 (never, hardly noticed, slightly, moderately, strongly, very strongly).
All items have the following response format: 1 = not at all true, 2 = hardly true, 3 = moderately true, 4 = exactly true [ 15].
Items were answered on a four point scale (1 = not at all true, 2 = hardly true, 3 = moderately true, 4 = exactly true), with a higher score indicating a higher self-efficacy.
The GSE-questionnaire operationalizes the psychological construct „self efficacy", consisting of 10 items ranging from 1 = Not at all true, 2 = Hardly true, 3 = Moderately true to 4 = Exactly true.
Participants' general self-efficacy in overall healing capability was assessed in this study by using the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) instrument consisting of 10 questions with a four-item response format (1 = Not at all true; 2 = Hardly true; 3 = Moderately true; 4 = Exactly true).
In 1997, Bill Clinton nominated him to the D.C. Circuit, where he earned a reputation as moderately left of center but hardly controversial.
Responses were recorded on a 0 5 rating scale (never = 0, hardly noticed = 1, slightly = 2, moderately = 3, strongly = 4, very strongly = 5).
Under conditions where the antibody was hardly active and the RNActive® vaccine only moderately active against the tumor, the combination was able to control tumor growth.
Work ability was assessed by one question "To what degree is your ability to perform your ordinary work reduced today: hardly reduced at all, not much reduced, moderately reduced, much reduced and very much reduced" [ 23].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com