Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

hard to identify

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hard to identify" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that is difficult to recognize or determine. Example: "The symptoms of the illness can be hard to identify, making diagnosis challenging."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was hard to identify with them.

News & Media

Independent

The trend is not hard to identify.

"It's hard to identify," he said.

The reasons are not hard to identify.

It's hard to identify when exactly the depression began.

News & Media

The Guardian

"They are really hard to identify," Ms. Ma said.

News & Media

The New York Times

Today, it is hard to identify their successors.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It's hard to identify, which is why it's often overlooked".

News & Media

The New York Times

Jazz Samba's magic formula wasn't hard to identify.

But sometimes, groups are extremely hard to identify.

News & Media

The New York Times

It's not hard to identify reasons for their distress.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "hard to identify", ensure the context clearly specifies what is causing the difficulty in identification. Be specific about the attributes or conditions that make something hard to discern.

Common error

Avoid using "hard to identify" without providing any context. Instead of saying "The problem is hard to identify", specify what makes it so: "The problem is hard to identify because the symptoms are subtle and easily overlooked."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hard to identify" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun or pronoun, indicating a quality of being difficult to recognize or ascertain. Ludwig AI confirms this through numerous examples across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

23%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Social Media

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "hard to identify" is a common and grammatically sound way to express difficulty in recognizing or determining something. As Ludwig AI indicates, it appears frequently in news, science, and general contexts, suggesting its versatility. To maximize clarity, it's essential to specify what makes something difficult to identify, avoiding overgeneralizations. Consider using alternatives like "difficult to discern" or "challenging to recognize" to add nuance to your writing. Overall, "hard to identify" is a valuable tool for conveying challenges in perception and understanding.

FAQs

What does "hard to identify" mean?

The phrase "hard to identify" describes something that is difficult to recognize, discern, or pinpoint. It suggests that there are obstacles preventing clear recognition or understanding.

What can I say instead of "hard to identify"?

You can use alternatives like "difficult to discern", "challenging to recognize", or "tough to make out" depending on the context.

How can I use "hard to identify" in a sentence?

Use "hard to identify" to describe something that is not easily recognized or determined. For example, "The source of the error was hard to identify" or "The bird species was hard to identify due to its similar appearance to other species".

Is it correct to say "hard to identify for" instead of "hard to identify"?

While not grammatically incorrect, adding "for" after "hard to identify" is usually unnecessary and can make the sentence less concise. It's generally better to use "hard to identify" on its own. For example: "The culprit was hard to identify" is better than "The culprit was hard to identify for the police".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: