hard facts

USAGE SUMMARY

"hard facts" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to indisputable and factual information. For example, "We need to base our decisions on hard facts, not assumptions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Just the cold, hard facts.

The New York Times

But consider some hard facts.

The Economist

Two hard facts.

The New York Times

Hard facts about soft drinks.

Harvard University

Wild rumours and hard facts.

The Guardian - Opinion

"There are no hard facts.

The Guardian

Now we have hard facts.

The Guardian

Cold, hard facts don't interest her.

The New York Times - Books

The hard facts are only partly hidden.

The New York Times - Arts

Numbers appear to be hard facts.

The New York Times

Now the hard facts are plain.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "hard facts", ensure they are verifiable and supported by credible sources to maintain objectivity and trustworthiness.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two "hard facts" are correlated, one necessarily causes the other. Always investigate potential confounding variables.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hard facts" functions as a noun phrase, where "hard" modifies the noun "facts". According to Ludwig, it is commonly used to refer to indisputable and factual information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "hard facts" is a common and grammatically sound way to refer to verifiable and objective information. According to Ludwig AI, it is appropriate for use in various contexts, from formal academic papers to news reporting. While the phrase itself is neutral, it is crucial to ensure that any information presented as "hard facts" is supported by credible evidence and presented without bias. Alternatives like "indisputable facts" or "concrete evidence" can be used for slight variations in emphasis. Remember to avoid confusing correlation with causation when interpreting and presenting "hard facts".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

indisputable facts

Focuses on the undeniable nature of the facts.

concrete evidence

Highlights the tangible and verifiable nature of the evidence.

verifiable data

Emphasizes the ability to confirm the accuracy of the information.

objective truths

Stresses the unbiased and impartial nature of the truths.

undeniable truths

Highlights the irrefutable nature of the truths.

established facts

Highlights that the facts have been confirmed.

proven data

Focuses on data that has been confirmed through testing or analysis.

solid evidence

Emphasizes the reliability and strength of the evidence.

incontrovertible evidence

Emphasizes that is impossible to deny or disprove evidence

cold facts

Implies an unemotional and objective view of the facts, sometimes negative implications.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "hard facts" in a presentation?

Incorporate "hard facts" with visual aids like charts and graphs to enhance understanding and credibility. Always cite your sources to maintain transparency.

What are some alternatives to saying "hard facts"?

You can use alternatives like "indisputable facts", "concrete evidence", or "verifiable data" depending on the context.

Are "hard facts" always objective?

"Hard facts" should ideally be objective, but their interpretation can be subjective. Ensure your presentation of facts minimizes potential bias.

What's the difference between "hard facts" and opinions?

"Hard facts" are verifiable and objective, while opinions are subjective and based on personal beliefs or interpretations. Rely on "objective truths" instead of opinions.