Sentence examples for handover connections from inspiring English sources
CP admission control policy and network performance were evaluated in terms of the blocking and dropping probabilities for new and handover connections.
We assume i = 2 and we denote the threshold of the handover connection request by σ.
The dropping probabilities of handover connection requests for services will be increased when CMR increases, as shown in Figure 5.
This is because the bandwidth of type 1 service handover connection requests is lower than that of type 2 services.
All handover connection requests for a type 2 service are changed into type 2* services if σ = 0.
The method used adaptive coding of handover connection service requests and the parameter adjustment of CAC policy functions in a multi-service cellular system.
Pf1, Pf2, and Pf3 are the forced termination probabilities of handover connection requests of types 1, 2, and 2* services, respectively.
The difference in the dropping probabilities of handover connection requests for type 1 services between σ = 62 and 55 is very large, as shown in Figure 9.
In contrast, the dropping probabilities of handover connection requests of a type 2* service are higher than a type 1 service.
The adaptive coding probability of handover connection requests with a type 2 service gradually increases while the remaining capacity of cell 1 gradually decreases.
The handover connection requests for type 2 services are easily changed into those of type 2* service if the adaptation coding threshold is decreased.
