Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Mixed feeding during the first half of infancy was widespread in both groups [ 11, 31].
The least fortunate infant feeding practice, mixed feeding during the first half of infancy, was thus often a consequence of not disclosing HIV-status.
The total study sample was large and infant feeding data were rigorously collected using both 24 hour and previous 7 day recall at four times during the first half of infancy.
For underweight, the WHO standards will result in a substantial increase in rates of low weight-for-age during the first half of infancy (i.e., 0 6 months) and a decrease thereafter.
This document re-emphasizes that lack of exclusive breastfeeding in the first half of infancy is a major risk factor for infant/childhood morbidity and mortality, which is then compounded by inappropriate complementary feeding.
As shown in an earlier paper from our group [ 6] with regard to weight-for-age, the average weight of infants included in the WHO standards is above the NCHS median during the first half of infancy, crosses it at about 6 months, and tracks below it thereafter.
Similar(54)
The present study showed that during the first half year of infancy, various psychosocial factors differ significantly with regard to their risk for development and persistence of infant difficult behaviors.
In general, it can be stated that the direct significance of some aspects of prenatal history (such as maternal emotional well-being) decrease during the first half year of infancy, while aspects of the postnatal child environment (such as maternal attitudes toward infant-rearing) become more significant.
Our research revealed that early manifestation of infant difficult behaviors increases the risk for the continuity of these problems during the first half-year of infancy.
Our research revealed that the early manifestation of infant difficult behaviors increases the risk for continuation of problems during the first half-year of infancy.
Gaza had an overwhelmingly young population with more than half being between the ages of infancy to 19 (60.8%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com