Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
had working with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "had working with" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a mix-up of verb tenses and forms, and it should be rephrased for clarity. Example: "I had been working with the team on the project before it was canceled."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
26 human-written examples
Also tells about his famous temper and the difficulties his collaborators have had working with him.
News & Media
Now consider an experience I had working with a large retail bank in the early 1980s.
News & Media
Indeed she had: working with a rescue centre to trace underage soldiers and remove them from the jungle.
News & Media
And I think the reason for that comes from the experience I had working with Ed Miliband.
News & Media
I took all the people that I had working with me – my lawyer, my agent, the president of my then-production company.
News & Media
What is perhaps more significant than the amount of money being provided is the organization and the type of experience that W.H.O. has had working with developing countries.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
34 human-written examples
He had worked with both before.
News & Media
"He had worked with him," she said.
News & Media
leaders they had worked with.
News & Media
(Diana met Princess Grace of Monaco, who had worked with Alfred Hitchcock, who had worked with Chandler).
News & Media
We had worked with him on Cars.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "had working with" in formal writing. Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives like "had worked with" or "had experience collaborating with" for clear communication.
Common error
A common mistake is using "had working with" instead of the correct past perfect tense "had worked with". Ensure the verb form aligns with standard English grammar to avoid confusion.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "had working with" is a grammatically incorrect attempt to express a past relationship or collaboration. Ludwig AI identifies it as non-standard English, suggesting it should be avoided in formal writing.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "had working with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in standard English. Ludwig AI flags it as an error, advising users to opt for grammatically sound alternatives such as "had worked with", "had experience collaborating with", or other similar phrases to clearly and accurately convey the intended meaning of past collaboration or experience. Paying attention to verb tense and grammatical structure is crucial for effective communication in both formal and informal contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
had worked with
This alternative corrects the tense and grammatical structure by using the past perfect form of "work" to indicate a completed action.
had experience collaborating with
This alternative emphasizes a cooperative effort and uses the correct grammatical structure to express past experience.
had the opportunity to work with
This phrase highlights the chance or occasion to collaborate, adding a nuance of privilege or circumstance.
had been employed with
Focuses on a formal employment relationship and uses correct grammar to indicate past association.
had partnered with
This suggests a formal partnership and uses the past perfect tense to indicate a completed partnership.
had consulted with
This indicates a professional advisory relationship and employs grammatically correct past perfect tense.
had trained with
Focuses on shared training or instruction and corrects the grammatical structure to the past perfect tense.
had assisted
Highlights the act of providing assistance in the past, using correct tense and structure.
had connections with
Emphasizes existing professional network to the topic, using correct tense and structure.
had engaged with
It focus on a formal collaboration in the past, using correct tense and structure.
FAQs
How can I correct "had working with" in a sentence?
Replace "had working with" with grammatically correct alternatives like "had worked with" or "had experience collaborating with" to ensure clarity and accuracy.
What are some alternatives to "had working with" that emphasize collaboration?
Use phrases like "had the opportunity to work with" or "had partnered with" to highlight cooperative efforts in a grammatically sound way.
Is "had working with" acceptable in informal conversation?
While it might be understood in very informal contexts, it's best to avoid "had working with" altogether. Use correct grammar even in casual settings to maintain clarity and avoid misinterpretation.
What's the difference between "had working with" and "had worked with"?
"Had working with" is grammatically incorrect, while "had worked with" is the correct past perfect tense, indicating a completed action or collaboration in the past. Always use the latter for accurate and effective communication.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested