had well received

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had well received" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would typically be "had received well" or "had been well received." Example: "The proposal had been well received by the committee, leading to further discussions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

"Upstream Color" and "Pit Stop," which she also stars in, had just had well-received premieres at Sundance.

The New York Times

Mr. Hnath's "Isaac's Eye" and "A Public Reading of an Unproduced Screenplay About the Death of Walt Disney" had well-received New York runs earlier this year.

The New York Times

The company said the Priv had been well received.

The Guardian - Tech

The company said new products, including soups and steak and cheese rolls had been well received.

The Guardian - Business

Leaders of civic groups in Newark said Mr. Santiago had been well received by the public.

The New York Times

In 1998 his short collection, After Attila, had been well received.

The Guardian - Books

Serjeant Musgrave had been well received there and Arden collaborated with several American theatre groups.

The Guardian

But he said the performance had been well received by the audience and reviewers.

The New York Times - Arts

The new framework has been implemented since November 2013 and has been well received by MSF researchers.

BMC Medical Ethics

"Mike's addition has been well received".

The New York Times - Sports

"Expo has been well received in New Rochelle.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the passive construction "had been well received" to correctly express that something was received positively in the past. For example: "The proposal had been well received by the committee."

Common error

Ensure the adverb "well" is correctly positioned. The phrase "had well received" reverses the proper order. Always use "had been well received" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had well received" is an incorrect past perfect construction intended to describe something that received a positive reception. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct form is "had been well received."

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had well received" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The correct form is "had been well received". As indicated by Ludwig, the data confirms that the phrase does not appear in reliable sources. Ensure you use the correct passive construction to accurately convey that something was positively received in the past. Alternatives such as "was favorably received" or "met with approval" can also be used depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had been well received

Uses the passive voice to correctly indicate something was received positively.

had a positive reception

Replaces "well received" with "positive reception", keeping the same tense.

was favorably received

Uses "favorably" instead of "well" to describe the reception.

was greeted warmly

Emphasizes the warmth of the reception, changing the tone slightly.

met with approval

Focuses on the approval aspect of the reception.

was welcomed enthusiastically

Highlights the enthusiastic nature of the welcome.

enjoyed a good response

Shifts the focus to the response received, implying positive feedback.

was highly commended

Indicates that the subject was praised or lauded.

garnered acclaim

Uses a more formal term, "garnered", to indicate widespread praise.

proved popular

Indicates that the subject was successful and liked by many.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something "had a good reception"?

The correct phrase is "had been well received". This passive construction accurately conveys that something was received positively.

Is "had well received" grammatically correct?

No, "had well received" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "had been well received".

What are some alternatives to "had been well received"?

Alternatives include "was favorably received", "met with approval", or "enjoyed a good response" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How can I use the phrase "had been well received" in a sentence?

Example: "The new policy had been well received by the employees, leading to increased productivity."