Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had substantial expectations

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had substantial expectations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's beliefs or hopes regarding a particular outcome or situation in the past. Example: "After reviewing the project proposal, the investors had substantial expectations for its success."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

In addition the report found that "structural constraints and expectations built into academic institutions assume that faculty members have substantial support from their spouses".

Science & Research

Science Magazine

We have substantial debt.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr. Putin, you have substantial achievements.

News & Media

The New York Times

So companies now have substantial foreign shareholders.

News & Media

The Economist

All four have substantial land holdings.

News & Media

The New York Times

Togo also has substantial marble deposits.

Italy and Germany have substantial natural gas vehicle fleets.

News & Media

The New York Times

We have substantial positions in Yahoo!

News & Media

Forbes

He accepts many people have "substantial reservations ".

News & Media

BBC

Civil recourse theory has substantial explanatory power.

Science

SEP

"But it could have substantial persuasive force".

Science & Research

Science Magazine
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had substantial expectations" to clearly convey that someone held significant beliefs about future outcomes based on present circumstances or actions.

Common error

Avoid using "had substantial expectations" when you actually mean "desired a lot". Expectations are grounded in a belief about what is likely to happen, not just what one wishes would happen.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had substantial expectations" functions as a description of someone's state of mind in the past. It indicates that they believed a particular outcome was likely or highly probable. Since no examples of this phrase were found, Ludwig's AI describes it as correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had substantial expectations" is grammatically correct and describes a state of strong anticipation for a particular outcome. Although no direct examples were found, Ludwig confirms its usability. While versatile, it should be used when the expectations are based on reasoning or evidence, rather than mere desire. Alternatives such as "held significant hopes" or "harbored considerable anticipations" can provide subtle differences in meaning. The expert rating is 4.1, reflecting a balance between grammatical correctness and usage appropriateness.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "had substantial expectations" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "held significant hopes", "harbored considerable anticipations", or "anticipated noteworthy results". These phrases convey a similar meaning with a more elevated vocabulary.

What's the difference between "had substantial expectations" and "had high hopes"?

While similar, "had substantial expectations" implies a belief based on some evidence or reasoning, while "had high hopes" focuses more on the optimistic desire for a particular outcome, even without strong evidence.

Is it correct to say "had substantial expectations for" something?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. For example, "The investors had substantial expectations for the project's profitability". It clearly indicates the object of the expectations.

What are some common synonyms for "substantial" in the context of "had substantial expectations"?

Common synonyms include "significant", "considerable", "notable", and "remarkable". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. Consider if you want to highlight size, importance, or impact.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: