Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had no reads

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no reads" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something, such as a document or a post, has not been viewed or read by anyone. Example: "Despite sharing the article widely, it had no reads in the first few hours."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

This yielded summarized read counts for 36,229 genes annotated by Ensembl 59. 12,632 of these genes had no reads across all lanes and were not considered further.

Science

Plosone

Another 7,414 genes had no reads for at least one B6 and one D2 sample and were considered to be unreliable.

Science

Plosone

Alignments in intergenic positions were sometimes located close to genes that had no reads mapping within them.

TWIST2 had no reads in MDCK cells and too few in MDCK-Ras cells to perform differential expression analyses.

Three genes (AaHsp70Bb, AaHsp70Bb' and AaHsp70Ca') had no reads mapping in any sample, whereas <10 reads mapped to the remaining genes.

Overall ~97% of the annotated genes had more than one read mapped, while merely ~3% of the annotated genes had no reads mapped, indicating good sequencing depth.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Fundamentally, pre-fetchable memory space has no read "side effects," which means no matter how many times one reads it, one gets the same result.

If true, and I've no read to believe it's not true, I imagine E3 this year will be all about Halo.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Among these, 420 transcripts have no read mapped from root and shoot data sets, indicating their expression in mature leaf and/or flower buds (Supplementary Table S4).

As expected the majority of pseudogenes have no reads aligning to their sequence.

One gene (DEFB6) has no reads aligned 30 DPP and an average of 28 reads aligned 15 DPP.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing scientific data or technical results, use "had no reads" to clearly indicate the absence of mapped reads for specific genes, transcripts, or genomic regions. This emphasizes a lack of expression or representation in sequencing data.

Common error

Avoid using "had no reads" when you mean someone didn't understand something. "Had no reads" specifically refers to the absence of data in a sequencing context, not a person's reading comprehension. Instead, say "struggled to understand" or "misinterpreted".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no reads" primarily functions as a statement of fact, indicating the absence of data in a sequencing context. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. This phrase is most frequently used in scientific and technical writing, as shown in the examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had no reads" is a grammatically sound phrase commonly used in scientific and technical contexts to denote the absence of sequence reads in genomics experiments. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While alternatives like "received no views" or "had zero reads" exist, the phrase is best suited for formal reporting of sequencing data. It's crucial to use this phrase accurately, especially avoiding confusion with general reading comprehension. Predominantly found in scientific publications, its clear and specific meaning makes it an effective term for describing sequencing results.

FAQs

What does "had no reads" mean in genomics?

In genomics, "had no reads" signifies that, after sequencing, no sequence fragments (reads) aligned to a specific genomic region, gene, or transcript. This often suggests that the gene was not expressed or that the region is absent in the sample.

When is it appropriate to use "had no reads"?

Use "had no reads" when describing the results of sequencing experiments, particularly in contexts where you are discussing gene expression or genomic coverage. It's appropriate in scientific papers, technical reports, and bioinformatics analyses.

What are some alternatives to "had no reads"?

Alternatives include "received no views", "registered no reads", or "had zero reads", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Consider the context and the data being presented.

Is "had no reads" grammatically correct?

Yes, "had no reads" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English sentence structure. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It is frequently used in scientific literature to describe the absence of sequence reads.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: