had no opposition

USAGE SUMMARY

'had no opposition' is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You could use this phrase when one thing has occurred without any resistance or push-back from others. For example: "The new policy passed easily, as it had no opposition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

"They had no opposition".

The New York Times

Mr. O'Bannon had no opposition.

The New York Times

Judge Yates had no opposition in her party's primary.

The New York Times

The initial batch of judges had chosen a madly perverse shortlist from which the celebs had to choose, and Pullman had no opposition: no grand, dead poets or well-upholstered biographies.

The Guardian - Books

The Cleveland-based company said it had no opposition to Mr. Helu's acquiring up to 15percentt of its stock, but acquisitions beyond that amount "could be detrimental to the interests of other shareholders".

The New York Times

Indeed, in the most recent state legislative elections, in 2004, 25percentt of legislators had no opposition for re-election and about 60percentt were effectively unchallenged because they faced opponents who were unable to raise as little as $1,000 for their campaigns.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

He has no opposition to speak of.

The Guardian

Tiger has no opposition, only a field.

The New York Times - Sports

"I have no opposition to dog runs," he said.

The New York Times

"If he has no opposition, there is no chance to deflect blame.

The New York Times

Afghan officials were still insisting the second round would go ahead despite Mr Karzai has no opposition.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context makes it clear what or who "had no opposition". Providing sufficient detail is vital for comprehension.

Common error

Avoid using "had no opposition" when there was minimal, but existent, resistance. The phrase implies a complete absence of opposition, so it is not correct when something faced token resistance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no opposition" functions as a predicate within a sentence, indicating the state of lacking resistance or challenge. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in various contexts, from political races to policy implementation, where the absence of opposition is a significant factor. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had no opposition" is a grammatically sound phrase used to denote the absence of resistance or challenge. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and the provided examples from diverse sources, including the New York Times and The Guardian, show its application in various contexts such as elections, policy implementation, and general scenarios. While relatively uncommon, it's a clear and effective way to convey a lack of resistance. Remember to use it when there was truly no opposition, not just minimal pushback.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

faced no resistance

Emphasizes the absence of active resistance.

encountered no challenges

Highlights the lack of difficulties or obstacles.

met with no resistance

Similar to 'faced no resistance' but with a slightly different verb.

was unopposed

A more concise way of saying there was no opponent.

ran unopposed

Specifically used in election contexts.

was unchallenged

Highlights the lack of any challenge to a position or action.

was uncontested

Similar to 'unchallenged', but may imply a formal contest.

saw no resistance

Focuses on the observation of no resistance.

experienced no pushback

Emphasizes a lack of negative reaction or opposition.

found no adversaries

Highlights the absence of opponents or enemies.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "had no opposition"?

You can use alternatives such as "faced no resistance", "encountered no challenges", or "was unopposed" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "had no opposition" in formal writing?

Yes, "had no opposition" is suitable for formal writing. However, consider if a more precise term like "was unchallenged" or "met with no resistance" might be more appropriate for your specific context.

What does it mean when something "had no opposition"?

When something "had no opposition", it means there was no resistance, disagreement, or challenge to it. It passed or occurred without anyone actively opposing it.

Can "had no opposition" be used in the context of elections?

Yes, in the context of elections, "had no opposition" often means a candidate ran "ran unopposed", meaning there were no other candidates running against them.