had no objections

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no objections" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing agreement or lack of dissent regarding a proposal or decision. Example: "After reviewing the plan, I had no objections to moving forward with the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Rosen had no objections.

The New York Times

Greenwald had no objections.

The Guardian

Hardy had no objections.

The Guardian

He had no objections to Girardi's decision.

The New York Times

"The furniture industry had no objections," he said.

The New York Times

And he assured the ministers he had no "objections of a moral nature" to ending slavery.

The New York Times

The prosecution had no objections to Persky's handling of the case, she added.

The Guardian

Mr. Allen also said he had no objections to a shorter, scaled-down building.

The New York Times

Nafzger had no objections, sending Rutherford on a trail that eventually crossed Street Sense's path.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Fottorino said he had no objections to foreign ownership, which can be a sensitive subject in France, as elsewhere.

The New York Times

But the laid-back Hughes, whose fastball was crackling for much of the night, had no objections.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had no objections" to clearly and concisely indicate agreement or a lack of opposition to a proposal, plan, or action. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "had no objections" when a more active voice would strengthen your writing. For instance, instead of saying "The proposal had no objections from the committee", consider "The committee approved the proposal" to convey a more direct and impactful message.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no objections" functions as a declarative statement indicating agreement, acceptance, or lack of opposition to a specific proposal, decision, or action. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is correct and suitable for various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had no objections" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate agreement or a lack of opposition. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and appropriate in a wide range of contexts, from news reporting to scientific writing. While "had no objections" is generally neutral in tone, more formal alternatives like "expressed no dissent" or "concurred without reservation" may be preferred in specific situations. When using this phrase, ensure that your sentence structure is clear and active to maximize the impact of your communication. The most authoritative sources for this expression are reputable news outlets and scientific publications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

raised no concerns

Emphasizes the absence of worries or reservations rather than explicit objections.

expressed no dissent

Highlights the lack of disagreement or opposition voiced by someone.

showed no opposition

Highlights the lack of visible disagreement.

offered no resistance

Focuses on the absence of active opposition or struggle.

concurred without reservation

Emphasizes an unreserved agreement, suggesting no hidden doubts.

was in full agreement

Indicates complete accord and approval.

accepted without demur

Highlights acceptance without protest or hesitation, slightly more formal.

presented no counterarguments

Focuses on the lack of opposing points or justifications.

gave their approval

Stresses the act of granting permission or consent.

did not disagree

Uses a double negative to express agreement, which can sometimes be less direct.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "had no objections" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "expressed no dissent", "raised no concerns", or "concurred without reservation".

Is "had no objections" suitable for academic writing?

Yes, "had no objections" is perfectly acceptable in academic writing. It clearly communicates a lack of opposition. However, be sure that your sentence structure is clear and concise. You can also consider alternatives like "presented no counterarguments" for a slightly more formal tone.

What is the difference between "had no objections" and "had no concerns"?

While both phrases indicate a lack of opposition, "had no objections" suggests a more direct approval or acceptance. "Had no concerns" implies the absence of worries or reservations, which might be a slightly weaker endorsement.

When should I use "raised no objections" instead of "had no objections"?

"Raised no objections" is particularly useful when emphasizing that someone actively voiced their approval or at least didn't voice any disapproval during a discussion or review process. "Had no objections" is a more general statement of agreement.