had no cases for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no cases for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that there were no instances or examples of something in a particular context or situation. Example: "The lawyer stated that they had no cases for the defense strategy they were considering."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Guinea was declared free of transmission today by the World Health Organization and the Government, having had no cases for 42 days – twice the maximum incubation period.

Unicef

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

But they have no case for a call to the barricades.

The New York Times

The UK Border and Immigration Agency BIAA) has ruled that the family has no case for seeking asylum and after seven years in Sheffield, they will be deported to Malawi on December 29.

The Guardian - Opinion

Elizabeth has no case for emancipation.

WikiHow

The local police prosecutor had no case files for at least a third of the prisoners, and he nonchalantly informed the presiding magistrate of missing witnesses.

The New Yorker

On Tuesday, the IPCC questioned the "honesty and integrity" of the officers, and said West Mercia Police had been wrong to conclude they had no case to answer for misconduct.

BBC

By the time the district attorney admitted that the government had no case, Browder had been locked up for 1,000 days, nearly 800 in solitary confinement.

The Washington Post

The black line for winners has no cases along it from Bachmann at 13% to Dole at 48%.

Huffington Post

Standard Swedish has no case endings in nouns except for the possessive s (as in English) and has only two genders (neuter, common).

Encyclopedia Britannica

In March 2015, a report by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee stated that the government had "no convincing case" for the rail line, suggesting there were cheaper alternatives.

BBC

In compliance with the World Health Organization's guidelines, the most at-risk district for MNT in a given country must have no recorded cases for a specific period of time in order to claim elimination.

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "had no cases for", ensure the context clearly indicates what lacked instances or justification. This phrase is most effective when emphasizing a complete absence rather than a scarcity.

Common error

Avoid using "had no cases for" when you intend to express a limited number of cases, not a complete absence. Instead, use phrases like "had few cases for" or "had limited examples of" to convey a smaller quantity rather than a total lack.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no cases for" functions as a declarative expression used to indicate the absence of instances, examples, or supporting evidence for something. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

25%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Academia

20%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had no cases for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate a complete lack of instances, evidence, or justification. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English. It is applicable across various contexts, including news, business, science, and general communication. When using the phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates the absence being emphasized and avoid using it when only a limited number of cases exist. Alternatives such as "lacked justification for", "had no basis for", and "had no evidence for" can be used to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had no basis for

Focuses on the lack of a foundational element or rationale.

had no evidence for

Highlights the absence of supporting proof or data.

possessed no grounds for

Stresses the lack of a legitimate or acceptable reason.

lacked justification for

Emphasizes the absence of a valid reason or support.

offered no support for

Highlights the absence of backing or assistance.

found no instances of

Specifically points to the absence of occurrences or examples.

presented no arguments for

Stresses the lack of persuasive points or reasoning.

identified no examples of

Focuses on failing to find specific instances of something.

demonstrated no need for

Emphasizes the absence of a requirement or necessity.

showed no indication of

Indicates a complete absence of signs or signals suggesting something.

FAQs

What does "had no cases for" mean?

The phrase "had no cases for" means that there were no instances, examples, or evidence to support a particular situation, argument, or need.

What are some alternatives to "had no cases for"?

You can use alternatives like "lacked justification for", "had no basis for", or "had no evidence for" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "had no cases for"?

Yes, the phrase "had no cases for" is grammatically correct and commonly used in both formal and informal contexts.

How can I use "had no cases for" in a sentence?

You can use "had no cases for" to indicate a lack of supporting instances, as in "The investigation concluded that they had no cases for prosecution".