had no abnormality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no abnormality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in medical or diagnostic contexts to indicate that no unusual findings were observed. Example: "The test results showed that the patient had no abnormality in their blood work."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

The unilateral mammograms either contained an abnormality (target-present), had no abnormality (target-absent), or was the contralateral breast from the target-present mammogram (no abnormality).

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

First visual analysis found a concordance between both experts for 61 children (86%) (kappa = 0.8113, p < 0.05); 28 of them had no abnormality, and the remaining 33 had at least one hypometabolic area.

EJNMMI Research

Out of these, three cases had no abnormality on any imaging modality.

Cancer Imaging

For comparison, fecal samples were collected from healthy volunteers, who had no abnormality as determined by medical examination.

BMC Gastroenterology

As the right fallopian tube, both ovaries and appendix had no abnormality, left salpingectomy and extirpation of the left paratubal cyst were performed.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

They had no abnormality at 1 month old but showed profound memory loss at three months (one-way ANOVA, * p < 0.05).

Experimental Neurology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

The new recommendation said that if a woman had no abnormalities on a Pap test for three years in a row, she could safely get the test less often, at the discretion of her physician.

The New York Times - Health

We included 128 subjects who had no abnormalities on a spiral chest CT scan.

European Radiology Experimental

According to the preanesthetic examination that was performed at the other institution, the patient had no abnormalities in his blood or urine.

JA Clinical Reports

The main gearbox of a helicopter which crashed with the loss of 16 lives had "no abnormalities" the previous night, a fatal accident inquiry has heard.

BBC

Moreover, Mib1f/− mice also had no abnormalities.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had no abnormality" to clearly and concisely state the absence of any irregularities or deviations from the norm, especially in medical or diagnostic contexts. Ensure clarity by specifying what was examined and found to be normal.

Common error

Avoid using passive constructions where active voice would be clearer. Instead of "No abnormality was had", use the active "The patient had no abnormality" for more direct and impactful communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no abnormality" primarily functions as a descriptive statement. It indicates the absence of any unusual or irregular findings in a particular context. As noted by Ludwig AI, this phrase is commonly used in medical and diagnostic settings to report normal results.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

86%

News & Media

11%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had no abnormality" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate the absence of any unusual or irregular findings, as supported by Ludwig AI. Predominantly found in scientific and medical contexts, it serves to report normal results or negative findings from examinations or tests. Related phrases include "showed no anomalies" and "presented no irregularities". When writing, it's important to use active voice for clarity. While the phrase is generally formal, its frequency and clear meaning make it a versatile and useful expression in various settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

showed no anomalies

Emphasizes the lack of deviations from the expected or typical condition.

presented no irregularities

Highlights the absence of any inconsistent or unusual features.

revealed no anomalies

Focuses on the lack of abnormal findings upon investigation or examination.

exhibited no deviations

Indicates that there were no departures from a standard or expected state.

displayed no aberrations

Suggests the absence of any departure from what is normal or correct.

demonstrated no disorder

Highlights that no functional disturbance or abnormality was evident.

registered no abnormalities

Indicates that no abnormalities were recorded or detected during monitoring.

indicated no anomaly

Focuses on the absence of any indication of an abnormal condition.

yielded no abnormal result

Highlights that there was no irregular or unusual outcome from a procedure.

returned normal results

Indicates that test outcomes were within an expected range.

FAQs

How can I use "had no abnormality" in a sentence?

You can use "had no abnormality" to describe a situation where an examination or test revealed no unusual or irregular findings. For example, "The patient's blood tests "showed no anomalies"" or "The scan "revealed no abnormalities"".

What are some alternatives to saying "had no abnormality"?

Some alternatives include "showed no irregularities", "exhibited no deviations", "presented no anomalies", or "returned normal results". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "had no abnormality" or "showed no abnormalities"?

Both "had no abnormality" and "showed no abnormalities" are grammatically correct and can be used. "Had no abnormality" focuses on the state of the subject, while "showed no abnormalities" emphasizes the results of an examination or test. The choice depends on the intended emphasis.

What does it mean when a test result indicates that a patient "had no abnormality"?

It means that the test or examination did not reveal any unusual or irregular findings. This generally suggests that the area or system being examined is functioning within normal parameters, though further investigation might still be warranted depending on the clinical context.