Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had like to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had like to" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a mistaken combination of "would like to" or "had hoped to." Example: "I had like to attend the concert, but I couldn't make it."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Would I have liked to?

News & Media

The New York Times

I would have liked to say goodbye.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He would have liked to make films.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"I would've liked to have it.

News & Media

The New York Times

Would have liked to have seen Hart.

He would have liked to have been an actor.

News & Media

The Economist

I would have liked to have an extra day.

"We would have liked to have seen more".

News & Media

The New York Times

"I would have liked to have known my father".

News & Media

The New York Times

"I would have liked to have won this one.

We would have liked to have gotten all three".

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "had like to" in your writing. Instead, use "would like to" to express a present desire, or "would have liked to" for a past desire.

Common error

A common mistake is using "had" in place of "would" when expressing a desire. Remember that "would" is the correct auxiliary verb to indicate a hypothetical or polite wish.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had like to" is an incorrect attempt to express a desire or preference. Correct usage requires the auxiliary verb "would", as in "would like to" or "would have liked to". As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase violates standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had like to" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. To express a present desire, use ""would like to"". For a past desire that was not fulfilled, use ""would have liked to"". As Ludwig AI points out, using the correct auxiliary verb ensures clear and effective communication. Remember to avoid "had like to" in both written and spoken English to maintain grammatical accuracy.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express a desire or preference?

Use "would like to" for present desires and "would have liked to" for past desires. For example, "I "would like to" go to the store" or "I "would have liked to" attend the party".

Is "had like to" ever grammatically correct?

No, "had like to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct forms are "would like to" or "would have liked to", depending on the intended meaning.

What can I say instead of "had like to"?

Use alternatives like ""would like to"" for present desires or ""would have liked to"" for past desires.

What's the difference between "would like to" and "would have liked to"?

"Would like to" expresses a current desire, while ""would have liked to"" expresses a desire about something in the past that did not happen.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: