Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
had just received
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "had just received" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something was received very recently in the past, often in the context of communication or delivery. Example: "She was excited because she had just received the acceptance letter from her dream university."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Dangin had just received the raw pictures.
News & Media
He had just received a text.
News & Media
She had just received the same information from Interpol.
News & Media
She had just received her income tax refund.
News & Media
Indeed, the first butcher I called had just received a delivery of fresh quail.
News & Media
Ms. Bruce had been her boss, and the woman had just received a promotion.
News & Media
"Military zone," tersely explained an Israeli officer, who had just received a warrant declaring it such.
News & Media
As if China had just received a software upgrade, the package is being dubbed "reform 2.0".
News & Media
One evening, he reported that he had just received a message from Quincy Jones.
News & Media
By then, she had just received her undergraduate degree, and he had finished law school.
News & Media
His father, an artist and thwarted gardener, had just received a diagnosis of cancer.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "had just received" to clearly indicate that an action of receiving occurred very recently before another action or a specific point in time. This helps to establish a clear sequence of events for your reader.
Common error
Avoid using the simple past tense when the context requires the past perfect. "He received the news" is different from "He had just received the news when the phone rang". The latter clarifies that the receiving happened immediately before the ringing.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "had just received" functions as a verb phrase in the past perfect tense, modified by the adverb "just" to emphasize the immediacy of the action. According to Ludwig AI, this construction is grammatically correct and commonly used.
Frequent in
News & Media
74%
Science
14%
Wiki
3%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "had just received" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction to indicate that an action of receiving happened very recently. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for use in various contexts, particularly in news and media, and helps establish a clear timeline of events. When using this phrase, it's important to distinguish it from simple past tense and ensure it reflects the past perfect aspect to accurately convey the sequence of events. Alternatives such as "had recently received" or "had only just received" can be used for variety, but "had just received" is generally a reliable and effective choice.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
had only just received
Emphasizes the immediacy and recency of the receiving action, similar to the original phrase.
had recently been given
Uses passive voice to focus on the giver rather than the receiver, while maintaining the recent timeframe.
had newly acquired
Focuses on the acquisition of something, emphasizing the newness of the possession.
came into possession of just now
More descriptive and slightly more formal, indicating the moment of gaining possession.
was just handed
Informal and direct, highlighting the act of being given something recently.
had obtained just a moment ago
Emphasizes the very short time that has passed since the item was obtained.
had gotten possession of lately
Indicates a more general recent timeframe for acquiring something.
had secured just before
Implies effort in obtaining something shortly before the present moment.
had been the recipient of shortly before
Formal and emphasizes the role of receiver in the immediate past.
was just in receipt of
A slightly more formal and old-fashioned way of saying someone received something recently.
FAQs
How to use "had just received" in a sentence?
Use "had just received" to indicate that someone obtained something very recently before another event or point in time. For example, "She had just received her diploma when she got a job offer" shows the diploma preceded the job offer.
What can I say instead of "had just received"?
You can use alternatives like "had recently received", "had only just received", or "had newly acquired" depending on the context.
What is the difference between "had just received" and "had received"?
"Had received" indicates a past action of receiving, while "had just received" emphasizes the recency of that action in relation to another event. "He had received a letter" implies he got it sometime before, but "He had just received a letter when I saw him" means he got it very shortly before you saw him.
Is "just received" grammatically correct instead of "had just received"?
"Just received" is often used in informal conversation, but in formal writing, it's better to use "had just received" to maintain grammatical correctness. "Just received" can also be used as an adjective, but this changes the grammatical function.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested