Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
had high prediction
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "had high prediction" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey a past expectation or forecast, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The model had a high prediction of the stock market's performance last year."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Statistical analysis revealed that the proposed generalized SVR-based model had high prediction accuracy with an average absolute relative error (AARE) of 3.82%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0717, leave-one-out cross validation (Q2LOO) of 0.9975 and mean relative error (MRE) of 0.0288 on the training data.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
The distribution demonstrates that the hits had higher prediction values than non-hits in the same quantiles.
Science
While never better than partial pooling, no pooling had higher prediction accuracy than complete pooling for EL and KpR.
Science
The great majority of the points lay above the 45° line indicating that in most partitions the PM model had higher prediction accuracy than the P-only model.
Science
For these environments in all 50 partitions, the multienvironment model fitted to all environments jointly had higher prediction accuracy than the within-environment model.
Science
The 41K-SNP model had higher prediction accuracy than the pedigree model in 90% of the replicates and was higher in accuracy than the PC-SNP model in 66% of the replicates.
Science
A total of 1,777 of 2,655 false-positive SNPs were correctly predicted with this model with an accuracy rate of 66.9% and 2,203 of 2,765 true-positive SNPs were correctly predicted with this model with an accuracy rate of 79.7%, showing that the model had higher prediction accuracy for true-positive SNPs than for false-positive SNPs.
Science
The simulation results showed that the model has high prediction accuracy.
The experimental results suggest that the proposed model is capable of dealing with the nonlinearity and has high prediction accuracy.
The present developed model was validated by the experimental results and turned out to have high prediction ability.
Science
Regression analysis indicates that the strength model relative to pore structure addressed in this study has high prediction accuracy.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Replace "had high prediction" with more standard phrases such as "made an accurate prediction" or "forecasted with precision" for clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
Avoid constructing phrases like "had high prediction". It's better to use established expressions that convey the intended meaning, ensuring your writing is easily understood.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "had high prediction" functions as a noun phrase that attempts to describe a past forecast or expectation. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is not standard English. It aims to express a level of anticipated accuracy but does so in a grammatically awkward way.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "had high prediction" attempts to convey a past expectation of accuracy, it's not considered standard English and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's better to use established expressions like "made an accurate prediction" or "forecasted with precision". The phrase's limited usage and grammatical awkwardness make it a less effective choice for clear communication. The examples provided by Ludwig show that it occasionally appears in scientific and news contexts, but this does not validate its use. When aiming to express the idea of a prediction with high accuracy, selecting a grammatically sound alternative will significantly improve clarity and ensure the intended message is effectively communicated.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
predicted accurately
Focuses on the accuracy of the prediction rather than the prediction itself.
forecasted with precision
Emphasizes the precision of the forecast.
made a reliable forecast
Highlights the reliability of the forecast made.
anticipated with accuracy
Centers on the act of anticipating and its correctness.
estimated closely
Highlights the accuracy of estimation.
projected accurately
Focuses on the accuracy of the projection.
offered a precise forecast
Highlights the precision of the provided forecast.
predicted with confidence
Adds the aspect of confidence in the prediction.
made an informed prediction
Emphasizes that the prediction was based on information.
provided an insightful forecast
Focuses on the insightfulness of the forecast.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "had high prediction" to sound more natural?
Instead of "had high prediction", consider using phrases like "predicted accurately", "forecasted with precision", or "made a reliable forecast".
What's a grammatically correct alternative to "had high prediction"?
Grammatically correct alternatives include "made an accurate prediction", "provided a precise forecast", or "estimated closely".
Is "had high prediction" commonly used in academic writing?
No, "had high prediction" is not a common or recommended phrase in academic writing. Opt for clearer and more standard phrasing such as "demonstrated high predictive accuracy" or "achieved accurate predictions".
How does "predicted accurately" differ from "had high prediction"?
"Predicted accurately" emphasizes the successful outcome of the prediction process, whereas "had high prediction" is a less common and potentially confusing way to express a past expectation or forecast.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested