Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "had for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to something that someone has previously possessed or experienced. For example, "Jim had for a pet a greyhound named Max."
Exact(45)
Bludau asked what she had for breakfast.
"The hip that Osi had, for example".
And I had for a couple years.
Perhaps what the Heat had for breakfast.
It had for years struggled to survive.
What you had for lunch?
Similar(15)
Most have—for good reason.
We have for centuries.
They have for decades.
That's all I have for you.
I hope it has for you, too.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com