Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(4)
The mean atlas method suffered from a significant bias between the estimated neocortical SUVR and the PiB status, resulting in an overall error of 5.6% (R2 = 0.98), compared with the adaptive and multi-atlas approaches that had errors of 3.06% and 2.74%, respectively (R2 = 0.98), and no significant bias.
For off-axis net joint loads, the majority of measured loading errors were within the inter-quartile range for mean loads up to 80 N. Loads below 80 N and outside the inter-quartile range had errors of less than 1 N.
Before the launch of HST, estimates of the Hubble constant typically had errors of up to 50%, but Hubble measurements of Cepheid variables in the Virgo Cluster and other distant galaxy clusters provided a measured value with an accuracy of ±10%, which is consistent with other more accurate measurements made since Hubble's launch using other techniques.
The constant phase elements fit had errors of maximum 3% for the capacitances.
Similar(56)
Tree height estimates had error of 2.59%, while stem diameter estimates had error of 3.7%.
18.09.1963 Earthquake has errors of about 11 km in longitude and 10 km in latitude.
The optimized simulator has errors of less than 16% compared with direct program measurement in all the cases we studied, and typically much smaller errors.
The proposed methods in this paper with WB-, (G^{0} -, and (G^{1} -degree reductions have errors of 7, 5.1} -degreespectively.
This study might have errors of measurement and parallax for height, weight and waist circumference.
With that reassurance, however, must come the knowledge that all screening tests have errors of false positives and false negatives.
Time measurement has error of 0.1 min.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com