Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had corrected to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had corrected to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a change or adjustment made to something, often in the context of editing or revising text. Example: "The document had corrected to reflect the latest data before submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

If she had corrected to four hearts, as she might have, he would have gritted his teeth and surprised her by continuing to four no-trump.

All subjects had corrected to normal vision.

Science

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Both have corrected to neutral with lateral tibial physeal tethering.

We've corrected it to refer to the Madison, Wisconsin VA.

We have corrected this to be consistent.

Science

eLife

They seem to have corrected these shortcomings.

All participants were right-handed, had corrected-to-normal vision, and were free from psychiatric or neurological disorders.

This has been corrected to 1920s.

That has been corrected to proportional voting.

News & Media

The Guardian

This has been corrected to Ipsos Mori.

This has been corrected to 79%.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had corrected to" when you want to emphasize that a previous error or inaccuracy has been addressed and rectified in a text or dataset.

Common error

Avoid mixing tenses when using "had corrected to". Ensure that the surrounding sentences are also in the past perfect tense to maintain consistency and clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

94%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had corrected to" functions as a verb phrase indicating a past action of modifying something to rectify an error or inaccuracy. It signifies that a change has been made to align with a correct or desired state. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically sound and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had corrected to" is a grammatically correct verb phrase used to indicate that something has been modified to rectify an error. According to Ludwig AI, it is suitable for use in written English. It is most commonly found in news and scientific contexts, suggesting a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure consistency in tense and consider alternatives like "had adjusted to" or "had amended to" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "had corrected to" in a sentence?

You can use "had corrected to" to indicate that a mistake was previously present but has now been fixed. For instance, "The report had corrected to include the latest figures before being submitted."

What are some alternatives to "had corrected to"?

Some alternatives include "had adjusted to", "had amended to", or "had revised to", each implying a slightly different nuance of modification.

Is it better to use "had been corrected to" instead of "had corrected to"?

Both "had corrected to" and "had been corrected to" are grammatically correct, but "had been corrected to" uses the passive voice, which might be preferable when you want to emphasize the action rather than the actor. "The error had been corrected to reflect the accurate data" emphasizes that the correction occurred.

What is the difference between "had corrected to" and "was corrected to"?

"Had corrected to" implies that the correction happened at some point in the past before another past event, while "was corrected to" simply indicates that the correction happened in the past. The choice depends on whether you need to emphasize the sequence of past events.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

94%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: