Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had been tortured

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had been tortured" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a past event where someone experienced torture, often in a narrative or report about human rights abuses or personal accounts. Example: "The survivor recounted the harrowing details of how he had been tortured during his imprisonment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Some had been tortured.

News & Media

The Economist

He had been tortured.

News & Media

The Economist

Many of the dead had been tortured.

News & Media

The Economist

He had been tortured before being shot.

News & Media

The Economist

"I knew that he had been tortured.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Others had been tortured, but he wasn't.

News & Media

The New Yorker

According to investigators, he had been tortured.

News & Media

The Guardian

He had been tortured and shot, she said, weeping.

The pathologist said he had been "tortured to death".

News & Media

The Economist

He said he had been tortured into a confession.

News & Media

Independent

He had been tortured and shot in the head.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had been tortured" when you need to emphasize that the torture occurred before another point in the past. For instance, "He was eventually released after four years and said that he "had been tortured".

Common error

Avoid replacing the passive voice construction of "had been tortured" with an active construction when the actor is unknown or irrelevant. For example, instead of saying "Someone had tortured him", using "he "had been tortured"" emphasizes his experience, not the perpetrator.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been tortured" functions as a passive past perfect construction, indicating that the action of torturing was completed before a specific point in the past. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is considered correct and usable in written English. The phrase is typically used in narrative or reporting contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had been tortured" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in news and media contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to describe a past event of torture that occurred before another point in the past. When writing, consider alternatives like "had suffered torture" or "was subjected to torture" for variety, and ensure the passive voice construction fits the context. Avoid active voice constructions if the perpetrator is unknown or unimportant. Overall, the phrase is effective in conveying the experience of torture within a narrative or report.

FAQs

How can I use "had been tortured" in a sentence?

Use "had been tortured" to describe a past event where someone experienced torture before another event in the past. Example: "The victim revealed that he "had been tortured" during interrogation".

What are some alternatives to "had been tortured"?

You can use alternatives like "had suffered torture", "had endured torture", or "was subjected to torture", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was tortured" instead of "had been tortured"?

Both are grammatically correct, but they imply different time frames. "Was tortured" describes an event that occurred at a specific point in the past, while "had been tortured" indicates the torture occurred before another point in the past. Choose the one that best fits the timeline of your narrative.

What's the difference between "had been tortured" and "was being tortured"?

"Had been tortured" indicates that the torture was completed before another past event, while "was being tortured" implies that the torture was ongoing at a specific time in the past. The correct choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the completion or the duration of the torture.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: