Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
A total of 408 patient charts were reviewed, of which 151 (36.6%) had Axis I MHC.
The three aggressive behaviors had axis loadings of 0.85 (S-positions), 0.93 (tail-beats) and 0.94 (bites).
Patients were excluded if they had Axis I psychiatric disorders (depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, schizophrenia, paranoid disorder, or alcohol and/or drug-abuse disorders), were pregnant or lactating, and or if they refused to participate.
Exclusion criteria were those who (a) had Axis I diagnosis other than schizophrenia or substance use disorder, (b) had an organic mental disorder, (c) had a diagnosis of mental retardation, (d) were experiencing unstable general medical conditions, and (e) were grossly psychotic and unable to cooperate with the interviewer.
Similar(54)
In the Gothenburg group, 63 patients (76%) had axis-I disorders assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV – Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) [ 22]; all other subjects had a structured, DSM-IV-based, clinical interview supplemented with a life-time DSM-IV symptom checklist containing individual criteria or symptom definitions for all relevant axis-I disorders.
Kif3a mutants lack the Shh-dependent ventral neural types, but do not have axis duplications, defects in ventral morphogenesis or anterior neural truncations (Figure 1 and 2).
4 out of 7 subjects with no axis-I disorder did not have axis II-disorder according to the diagnostic threshold of axis-II although all subjects displayed single or multiple symptoms of some personality disorders.
Control subjects did not have axis-II disorders.
While each dancer has their own axis, you also have to counter balance each other equally.
Only two patients had an Axis II disorder without a comorbid Axis I disorder.
Thirty-seven percent of all subjects had an axis II diagnosis, and 28% of patients who met the criteria for an axis I diagnosis had concomitant personality disorders.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com