Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(59)
Dr. Quake said his machine had an accuracy of one error in every 20,000 units.
Doctors who read more than 3,600 mammograms a year had an accuracy rate of 76percentthoseose who read 1,200 or fewer averaged only 65percentt.
Decision Tree had an accuracy 0f 86%, Naïve Bayes had an accuracy of 84%, and finally, Deep Learning had an accuracy of 89%.
This external prediction set had an accuracy of 99.44%.
A second exploratory analysis on self-reported patients had an accuracy (c-statistic) of 71%.
Measurements were made with calipers that had an accuracy of 0.5 mm.
Cross-validation indicated that models had an accuracy of 70 85%.
Based on the differential correction report for these data, 75.35% of their corrected positions had an accuracy <5 cm and an additional 24.65% had an accuracy between 5 and 15 cm.
Based on the differential correction report, 71.5% of the corrected positions had an accuracy of 5 15 cm and 99.1% had an accuracy of 30 50 cm or better.
The 49.97 kiloparsecs figure is said to be accurate to 2.2% (previous measures had an accuracy of around 5-10%).
In their tests, Ubicoustics had an accuracy of about 80percentt — competitive with human accuracy, but not yet good enough to support user applications.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com