Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had a suspicion

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had a suspicion" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to express a feeling or belief that something is true or likely to happen. Example: "He had a suspicion that his coworkers were planning a surprise party for his birthday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"But deep down, I had a suspicion".

News & Media

The New York Times

"I had a suspicion she was interested," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

They had a suspicion about what was going wrong.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Even then, I had a suspicion it wasn't cool.

"I had a suspicion that we would be all right," Bushong said, laughing.

Still, "I had a suspicion that there may be undiscovered tool users out there," Rutz said.

By 2am we had a suspicion that it wasn't going to end well.

News & Media

The Guardian

I had a suspicion that someone in authority might well find these articles and throw them out for the reasons I gave you.

The investigators had a suspicion it was Melissa, but when they obtained DNA samples from Melissa's family.

News & Media

The Guardian

We had a suspicion of who it might be, because of the resources available, the vertical integration," Elop says.

He also fitted each turtle with a plastic box that collected its urine, for he had a suspicion that therein lay the key to the mystery.

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had a suspicion" when you want to express a feeling or belief that something might be true, without having definite proof. It's suitable for describing a hunch or an intuition.

Common error

While "had a suspicion" is widely understood, consider using more precise language in formal writing to specify the basis of your belief or intuition, such as "deduced", "inferred", or "hypothesized" depending on the context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had a suspicion" functions as a verb phrase expressing a state of mind. It indicates a belief or feeling that something is possibly true, lacking concrete evidence. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and in common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had a suspicion" is a common and grammatically correct way to express a feeling or belief without concrete proof. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's frequently used across various contexts, from news reporting to academic discussions, though it leans towards a neutral register. While versatile, it is essential to consider the formality of your writing and choose more precise language when appropriate. Related phrases like "suspected something" or "harbored a suspicion" can add nuance. Remember to use "had a suspicion" to denote an inkling or hunch, and consider stronger verbs like "inferred" or "deduced" when definitive evidence supports your claim.

FAQs

How can I use "had a suspicion" in a sentence?

You can use "had a suspicion" to indicate that you believed something might be true even without firm evidence. For example, "She /s/had+a+suspicion about her coworker's sudden success."

What's a more formal way to say "had a suspicion"?

In formal contexts, you might prefer alternatives like "inferred", "surmised", or "presumed" to convey a more precise nuance than the general "/s/had+a+suspicion".

Is it ever incorrect to use "had a suspicion"?

While grammatically correct, "/s/had+a+suspicion" may be too informal or vague for academic or professional writing. Consider stronger verbs if you possess concrete evidence.

What is the difference between "had a suspicion" and "knew"?

"Knew" implies certainty and confirmed knowledge, whereas "/s/had+a+suspicion" suggests a belief or feeling without definitive proof.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: